hello
On 27 Mar 2011, at 14:37, "Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> wrote: > It could go in the Notation Reference with some introductory > text, but I prefer Phil's suggestion to include this in the > regression test suite. Yes I think this could go as a reg test. It might be nice as an Appendix to the NR but these look like auto generated / scripted parts of the doc. That is beyond my ken. As a related topic, someone asked for the various paper sizes we support listed (or some such similar list which is available but only via the .ly or .scm files). James _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
