"Eluze" wrote in message
news:1373472156494-147857.p...@n5.nabble.com...
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
Probably simplest.
sure, but what status?!
Eluze
Accepted. Just done it.
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
> Probably simplest.
sure, but what status?!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Layout-block-inside-a-bookpart-block-tp147822p147857.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.
"Eluze" wrote in message
news:1373451882168-147846.p...@n5.nabble.com...
Barikavily wrote
I'm not top posting.
% I wish to define layout properties for a bookpart block
% but it doesn't seem to work.
% Lilypond says "\paper is necessary".
% Am I missing something?
it is not possible to defi
2013/7/10 Eluze :
> Barikavily wrote
>>> I'm not top posting.
>>
>> % I wish to define layout properties for a bookpart block
>> % but it doesn't seem to work.
>> % Lilypond says "\paper is necessary".
>> % Am I missing something?
>
> it is not possible to define a \layout block in a \book or a \bo
overseen:
3.1.3 Multiple output files from one input file
should this issue be re-opened?!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Layout-block-inside-a-bookpart-block-tp147822p147846.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
> I'm not top posting.
% I wish to define layout properties for a bookpart block
% but it doesn't seem to work.
% Lilypond says "\paper is necessary".
% Am I missing something?
\version "2.16.2"
\paper { top-margin = 50 }
\layout { indent = 50 }
\bookpart {
\paper { top-margin = 0 }
