Updates:
Status: Verified
Labels: -fixed_2_15_4 -fixed_2_14_2 -backport fixed_2_15_15
Comment #23 on issue 1701 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: default accidental style
prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
Since there is nothing to b
Comment #22 on issue 1701 by percival.music...@gmail.com: default
accidental style prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
no more 2.14 releases are planned. Let the translators deal with the
change.
__
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: backport
Comment #21 on issue 1701 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: default accidental style
prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
Examples updated with commit fb04880
Backport would be nice in case there
Comment #20 on issue 1701 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: default accidental style
prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
the documentation hasn't been adapted.
Oops. I've adapted the examples, and the docstring for Internals (and will
push the cha
Comment #19 on issue 1701 by freyraph...@gmail.com: default accidental
style prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
PS: For the last point in the above list
([http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/learning/modifying-context-properties]
Comment #18 on issue 1701 by freyraph...@gmail.com: default accidental
style prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
Please note that after changing the 'extraNatural' behaviour, the
documentation hasn't been adapted. All references of 'extra
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #17 on issue 1701 by philehol...@googlemail.com: default accidental
style prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates:
Labels: fixed_2_14_2
Comment #16 on issue 1701 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: default accidental
style prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
Yes, I should have added the flag.
___
bug-
Comment #15 on issue 1701 by brownian.box: default accidental style prints
too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
Sorry, did not test with 2.14.2 yet (Carl, should "fixed_2_14_2" be added?
Or "backported" or the like?).
_
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #14 on issue 1701 by brownian.box: default accidental style prints
too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
Sorry, did not test with 2.14.2 yet (Calr, should "fixed_2_14_2" be added?
Or "backported" or the like?
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #13 on issue 1701 by brownian.box: default accidental style prints
too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
Initial snippet looks like in comment #3.
___
bug-lilypo
Comment #12 on issue 1701 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: default accidental
style prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
fixed_2_14_2
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-review fixed_2_15_4
Comment #11 on issue 1701 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: default accidental style
prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
Patch in comment 1 pushed as 4a3cd8465
The mailing lis
bruys . gmail.com> writes:
> I came across a further reference, in Richard Rastall's The Notation of
> Western Music (2nd edition), if you look at the main index reference under
> "accidental" (I'd quote the page number, but I don't have the book with me),
> you'll see that he explicitly refers t
On 11-06-29 11:20 PM, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #10 on issue 1701 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: default accidental
style prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
No such plans. It has already been through a countdown,
with no opposition,
Comment #10 on issue 1701 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: default accidental style
prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
No such plans. It has already been through a countdown,
with no opposition, only a successful search for examples where the old
Comment #9 on issue 1701 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: default accidental style
prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
I'd like to put this on a countdown, Keith. Do you plan any further work,
aqlong the lines of Graham's comment?
__
I'm looking at Dover's PIANO MUSIC OF ROBERT SCHUMANN: SERIES I which is a
reprint of Breitkopf & Härtel, originally printed between 1879 & 1887.
On page 179, 5th system, 2nd bar, there is an extra natural before the d#.
No other d's in sight, but the key signature is f minor. That would seem to
b
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:40:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > lilypond googlecode.com writes:
> >
> > > In light of the discussion about this patch, how hard would it be to
> > > make it controllable?
It would take a bit of thought to do with
Graham Percival writes:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:40:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> lilyp...@googlecode.com writes:
>>
>> > In light of the discussion about this patch, how hard would it be to
>> > make it controllable? I don't have a good idea of the name, since
>> > IIRC we already ha
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:40:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> lilyp...@googlecode.com writes:
>
> > In light of the discussion about this patch, how hard would it be to
> > make it controllable? I don't have a good idea of the name, since
> > IIRC we already have an extraNatural property.
>
>
lilyp...@googlecode.com writes:
> Comment #8 on issue 1701 by percival.music.ca: default accidental
> style prints too many 'extra' naturals
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
>
> In light of the discussion about this patch, how hard would it be to
> make it controllable? I
Comment #8 on issue 1701 by percival.music.ca: default accidental style
prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
In light of the discussion about this patch, how hard would it be to make
it controllable? I don't have a good idea of the name,
bruys . gmail.com> writes:
>
> I came across a further reference, in Richard Rastall's The Notation of
> Western Music (2nd edition),
I can look at that during my next trip to the closest university.
I did look through Bach's manuscript Well-tempered Clavier, noticed that a
natural alone suff
I came across a further reference, in Richard Rastall's The Notation of
Western Music (2nd edition), if you look at the main index reference under
"accidental" (I'd quote the page number, but I don't have the book with me),
you'll see that he explicitly refers to cancelling single accidentals. He i
An interesting question. I can't say I have. The trouble is, is that as soon
as you get a both a flattened and a sharpened note within the same bar, you
are likely to be looking at something fairly recent. The original bug
observation, too, referred to the flattened note being in the key signature.
Comment #6 on issue 1701 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: default accidental style
prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
I believe the [wikipedia] source quoted in that message is wrong.
Well, that is too strong a statement. It says that "some com
Comment #5 on issue 1701 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: default accidental style
prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
I believe the source quoted in that message is wrong. Look at the next
message in the thread.
All cited quotes of typeset mus
Comment #4 on issue 1701 by x.sche...@gmail.com: default accidental style
prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
When coming from g flat to g sharp, there should still be a natural
before the sharp according to this message, isn't it?
http://l
Comment #2 on issue 1701 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: default accidental style
prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
Output after the patch is below. The regression tests show only the
desired changes.
One can test this without recompiling, by
Comment #1 on issue 1701 by x.sche...@gmail.com: default accidental style
prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
Could we see the result after applying your PATCH?
Are we sure this "trivial" PATCH won't make bad side effects?
___
Status: Started
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Patch-review
New issue 1701 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: default accidental style prints too
many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
\relative c'' {\key a\major ges gis geses ges}
In 19th century
32 matches
Mail list logo
