On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:40:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > lilyp...@googlecode.com writes: > > > In light of the discussion about this patch, how hard would it be to > > make it controllable? I don't have a good idea of the name, since > > IIRC we already have an extraNatural property. > > As long as not a single user _wants_ the old behavior, why bother?
I thought that some people _did_ want that behavior. There is some discussion about whether or not they _should_ want that behavior, but if it's easy to accommodate them, I'd rather that lilypond allow people to shoot themselves in the foot if they specifically request it. That said, since this only changes something in scheme, presumably any user could redefine that function in their .ly file, thereby getting the old (possibly ridiculously bad) behavior? If so, then I have no objection to pushing the change now. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
