Re: Build issue in Fedora due to font changes

2015-01-23 Thread Ralph Palmer
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > FYI, Fedora has reverted the urw-fonts change, but this is still something > to consider fixing, as the change will need to be made eventually, and on > multiple distributions. > Jon and Werner and List - Just so this doesn't get lost in the

Re: Build issue in Fedora due to font changes

2015-01-21 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> Maybe Lilypond should package the old URW fonts until a > >> good replacement is available to avoid such dependencies. > > > > Possibly. Until such time as that occurs, is there a way I can > > disable Cyrillic support temporarily so th

Re: Build issue in Fedora due to font changes

2014-11-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Maybe Lilypond should package the old URW fonts until a >> good replacement is available to avoid such dependencies. > > Possibly. Until such time as that occurs, is there a way I can > disable Cyrillic support temporarily so that Lilypond will continue > to build? There is no way currently.

Re: Build issue in Fedora due to font changes

2014-11-25 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >> > >> With the latest release of the UFW fonts, they've dropped the > >> > >> Cyrillic glyphs due to poor quality. I see that both 2.18.x > >> > >> and 2.19.x still need ufw's ru fonts, and so lilypond fails to > >> > >> build in rawhi

Re: Build issue in Fedora due to font changes

2014-11-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> > >> With the latest release of the UFW fonts, they've dropped the >> > >> Cyrillic glyphs due to poor quality. I see that both 2.18.x >> > >> and 2.19.x still need ufw's ru fonts, and so lilypond fails to >> > >> build in rawhide. Is there another font set, preferably one >> > >> in Fedora al

Re: Build issue in Fedora due to font changes

2014-11-24 Thread Jon Ciesla
Thanks, I'll post to both. On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Federico Bruni wrote: > I think that the best place is lilypond-devel. > Werner may also help you > Il 24/nov/2014 16:25 "Knute Snortum" ha scritto: > >> Try posting your question here: >> >> lilypond-u...@gnu.org >> >> >> Knute Snortu

Re: Build issue in Fedora due to font changes

2014-11-24 Thread Federico Bruni
I think that the best place is lilypond-devel. Werner may also help you Il 24/nov/2014 16:25 "Knute Snortum" ha scritto: > Try posting your question here: > > lilypond-u...@gnu.org > > > Knute Snortum > (via Gmail) > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014

Re: Build issue in Fedora due to font changes

2014-11-24 Thread Knute Snortum
Try posting your question here: lilypond-u...@gnu.org Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Jon Ciesla > wrote: > > > >> With the latest release of the

Re: Build issue in Fedora due to font changes

2014-11-24 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> With the latest release of the UFW fonts, they've dropped the Cyrillic >> glyphs due to poor quality. I see that both 2.18.x and 2.19.x still need >> ufw's ru fonts, and so lilypond

Re: Build issue in Fedora due to font changes

2014-11-14 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > With the latest release of the UFW fonts, they've dropped the Cyrillic > glyphs due to poor quality. I see that both 2.18.x and 2.19.x still need > ufw's ru fonts, and so lilypond fails to build in rawhide. Is there > another font set, prefer

Build issue in Fedora due to font changes

2014-11-10 Thread Jon Ciesla
With the latest release of the UFW fonts, they've dropped the Cyrillic glyphs due to poor quality. I see that both 2.18.x and 2.19.x still need ufw's ru fonts, and so lilypond fails to build in rawhide. Is there another font set, preferably one in Fedora already, that you'd recommend or are planni

Re: Build issue

2011-09-23 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:38:59AM -0500, Stan Sanderson wrote: > > Version 2.15.8 was the last version I had downloaded prior to attempting > 2.15.11 and 2.15.12. I just now tried 2.15.9 and indeed it will not open. > Version 2.15.9 also appears to have a version number of 2.14.2, if that help

Re: Build issue

2011-09-23 Thread Stan Sanderson
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:46:02AM -0500, Stan Sanderson wrote: >> As previously reported, when Lilypond-2.15.12-darwin-ppc.tar.bz2 is >> decompressed on my G4 PowerBook running OS 10.5.8, it will not open. The OS >> warns, > > Hmm, appare

Re: Build issue

2011-09-23 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:46:02AM -0500, Stan Sanderson wrote: > As previously reported, when Lilypond-2.15.12-darwin-ppc.tar.bz2 is > decompressed on my G4 PowerBook running OS 10.5.8, it will not open. The OS > warns, Hmm, apparently the report didn't get through. Thanks, added as http://cod

Build issue

2011-09-22 Thread Stan Sanderson
As previously reported, when Lilypond-2.15.12-darwin-ppc.tar.bz2 is decompressed on my G4 PowerBook running OS 10.5.8, it will not open. The OS warns, Attempting to run LilyPond.app/Contents/MacOS/LilyPond results in a terminal warning of "Bad CPU type in executable." Version 2.11.8 works.