On 4/19/20, 9:07 AM, "Aidan O Connor" wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for that info. The workaround makes sense.
But the behavior seems a little inconsistent. If the cord names are removed the
bar numbers appear above the staff, but below the fret diagram. Is the fret
diagram not considered part of the s
Hi,
Thanks for that workaround, it works well.
Regards
Aidan
From: Xavier Scheuer
Sent: Sunday 19 April 2020 05:03
To: Aidan O Connor
Cc: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bar number with chord name
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 19:49, Aidan O Connor
mailto:a
From: v.villen...@gmail.com on behalf of Valentin
Villenave
Sent: Sunday 19 April 2020 15:40
To: Aidan O Connor
Cc: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bar number with chord name
On 4/18/20, Aidan O Connor wrote:
> When chord names are included, the bar numbers are positioned ab
On 4/18/20, Aidan O Connor wrote:
> When chord names are included, the bar numbers are positioned above the
> chord name.
Greetings,
Well, yes and no. They are positioned above the whole *system* (the
Score context), of which the ChordNames context is a part. So whilst
that’s certainly quite ugly
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 19:49, Aidan O Connor wrote:
>
> When chord names are included, the bar numbers are positioned above the
chord name. This is particularly noticeable if a fret diagram is also
included. The bar numbers should be positioned immediately above the staff.
> In this example, the c
When chord names are included, the bar numbers are positioned above the chord
name. This is particularly noticeable if a fret diagram is also included. The
bar numbers should be positioned immediately above the staff.
In this example, the chord name forces the second measure bar number out of
po
