On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> I agree that a revert would be more appropriate. However, a revert would
> be very difficult to accomplish, because there is no easy way to save the
> "original" value. The value is only known in the translation stage as a
> context prope
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 10/5/10 11:44 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>>>
>>> I think a revert would be more appropriate.
>>
>> I agree that a revert would be more appropriate. However, a revert would
>>
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 10/5/10 11:44 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>> Carl Sorensen writes:
>>
>>> On 10/5/10 5:50 PM, "Keith E OHara" wrote:
If \cadenzaOff turns autobeaming on, then what about scores that turn off
autobeaming for the whole p
On 10/5/10 11:44 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> On 10/5/10 5:50 PM, "Keith E OHara" wrote:
>>>
>>> If \cadenzaOff turns autobeaming on, then what about scores that turn off
>>> autobeaming for the whole piece, but then (mis-)use short cadenzas?
>>
>> The CHANGES f
