On 10/5/10 11:44 PM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes:
>
>> On 10/5/10 5:50 PM, "Keith E OHara" <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> If \cadenzaOff turns autobeaming on, then what about scores that turn off
>>> autobeaming for the whole piece, but then (mis-)use short cadenzas?
>>
>> The CHANGES file informs the user that they will need to turn off
>> autobeaming manually after the cadenza, as does the notation reference.
>>
>> I think this is the right thing to do.
>
> I think a revert would be more appropriate.
I agree that a revert would be more appropriate. However, a revert would
be very difficult to accomplish, because there is no easy way to save the
"original" value. The value is only known in the translation stage as a
context property, so we can't really save the value for use in the parsing
stage.
Right now, the benefit/time ration isn't high enough for me to code the
revert.
I'm fine to have an enhancement request to implement it as a revert,
however.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
