Re: [Ping] extraNatural and key changes

2011-01-17 Thread Keith OHara
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:16:07 -0800, James Bailey wrote: On Jan 15, 2011, at 12:48 AM, Keith OHara wrote: It looks like Lilypond /never/ printed all the canceling naturals, until Rune added the logic to find them all just before 2.10.3. At that time he made his enhancement optional, contro

Re: [Ping] extraNatural and key changes

2011-01-17 Thread James Bailey
On Jan 15, 2011, at 12:48 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:31:21 -0800, Keith OHara wrote: > >> The code causing this behavior appeared [...] >> so the behavior I dislike would have first appeared in 2.10.3. > >> Keith, >> >> You say this appeared in 2.10.3. In which stable re

Re: [Ping] extraNatural and key changes

2011-01-14 Thread Keith OHara
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:31:21 -0800, Keith OHara wrote: The code causing this behavior appeared [...] so the behavior I dislike would have first appeared in 2.10.3. Keith, You say this appeared in 2.10.3. In which stable release was the behaviour correct? Phil, I had trouble running 2

Re: [Ping] extraNatural and key changes

2011-01-14 Thread Phil Holmes
"Keith OHara" wrote in message news:op.vo9syj0ekr5sjt@ohara... On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:34:43 -0800, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Keith OHara wrote: P.S. I would be easily capable of this patch once I figure out git: I hope that you have read http://lilypond.org

[Ping] extraNatural and key changes

2011-01-13 Thread Keith OHara
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:34:43 -0800, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Keith OHara wrote: P.S. I would be easily capable of this patch once I figure out git: I hope that you have read http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/using-lily_002dgit Dear B