Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #4 on issue 1253 by brownian.box: programming error: (de)crescendo
on items with specified volume.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1253
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_47
Comment #3 on issue 1253 by percival.music.ca: programming error:
(de)crescendo on items with specified volume.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1253
Thanks, pushed.
Attachments:
0001-Better-wording-for
Updates:
Labels: Patch
Comment #2 on issue 1253 by percival.music.ca: programming error:
(de)crescendo on items with specified volume.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1253
Patch looks ok to me, but let's make sure that we have the Patch
Comment #1 on issue 1253 by markpolesky: programming error: (de)crescendo
on items with specified volume.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1253
programming error: (de)crescendo on items with specified
volume.
Wouldn't it be enough simply to reword the error messag
On Mon 06 Sep 2010, 08:47 Mark Polesky wrote:
> Dmytro,
>
> Since the error is with the midi engine, you need to add a
> \midi block to the \score (see below).
:-)
Thanks!
Thanks to all of you, added as 1253:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1253
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
Bug S
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Warning
New issue 1253 by brownian.box: programming error: (de)crescendo on items
with specified volume.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1253
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-09/msg00027
Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
> I am very sorry, i can not find original post; anyway.
>
> Original poster, please, provide a minimal example.
>
> I've tried[1] those lines by Mark[2] with "no success" --
> i could not reproduce error message mentioned.
>
> I am sorry, very probably this is my fault. Pl
On Wed 01 Sep 2010, 23:29 Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 11:24:55PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> > On 1 September 2010 22:51, Graham Percival wrote:
> >
> > > This looks like a harmless warning; I remember seeing it in 2003
> > > or 2004 or something like that. I didn't find it
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 11:24:55PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 1 September 2010 22:51, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > This looks like a harmless warning; I remember seeing it in 2003
> > or 2004 or something like that. I didn't find it with a quick
> > glance at the issue tracker, so producing
