On 2025-03-13 08:45, Dan Eble wrote:
Since we both feel that there's something wrong with the rests here,
I'll create a ticket about it later today.
I'm postponing this. Here's a piece marked 3/1, which is barred as 6/1,
where breve and longa rests are used to stand for triples rather than
On 2025-03-13 06:18, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Admittedly, I
have never seen a 12/1 time signature in the wild, so maybe I'm wrong.
I checked at
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_musical_works_in_unusual_time_
signatures#Upper_number_of_12, which doesn't list any work for 12/1, so
> "Brobdingnagische Gigue" [1] is in 24/1, but it has grouped whole
> rests rather than the longer rests.
Nice :-) I didn't know that piece!
Werner
On 2025-03-13 01:18, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Is it correct to notate these two `R\breve*6` rests differently?
Should there be a third mark in the 12/1 measure?
```
\version "2.24.4"
{
\compressEmptyMeasures
\time 2/1
R\breve*6
\time 12/1
R\breve*6
}
```
Yes, I think there shou
> Is it correct to notate these two `R\breve*6` rests differently?
> Should there be a third mark in the 12/1 measure?
>
>
> ```
> \version "2.24.4"
>
> {
> \compressEmptyMeasures
> \time 2/1
> R\breve*6
> \time 12/1
> R\breve*6
> }
> ```
Yes, I think there should be a third mark – t
Is it correct to notate these two `R\breve*6` rests differently? Should
there be a third mark in the 12/1 measure?
```
\version "2.24.4"
{
\compressEmptyMeasures
\time 2/1
R\breve*6
\time 12/1
R\breve*6
}
```
