Re: Fwd: Re: Non-customary clef printing

On 01/02/14 17:11, Marc Hohl wrote: LilyPond gets confused when the version string contains more than dots and numbers. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3832 Thanks James ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://

Re: redundant entries in the indexes are confusing and lesseningthe clarity

On 01/02/14 23:23, Eluze wrote: Federico Bruni-5 wrote 2014/2/1 Trevor Daniels < t.daniels@.co > James wrote Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:51 AM On 01/02/14 10:14, Eluze wrote: add \single, \temporary \undo and more to the index - is that worth an entry in the tracker!? A tracker? I'd

Re: redundant entries in the indexes are confusing and lesseningthe clarity

Federico Bruni-5 wrote > 2014/2/1 Trevor Daniels < > t.daniels@.co > > > >> >> James wrote Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:51 AM >> >> >> > On 01/02/14 10:14, Eluze wrote: >> >> >> add \single, \temporary \undo and more to the index - is that worth >> an >> >> entry in the tracker!? >> >> > A tr

Fwd: Re: Non-customary clef printing

Hi, obviously, LilyPond gets confused when the version string contains more than dots and numbers. This is a defect IMHO. Regards, Marc Original-Nachricht Betreff: Re: Non-customary clef printing Datum: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:11:45 +0100 Von: David Kastrup An: Marc Hohl Kopi

Re: redundant entries in the indexes are confusing and lesseningthe clarity

2014/2/1 Trevor Daniels > > James wrote Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:51 AM > > > > On 01/02/14 10:14, Eluze wrote: > > >> add \single, \temporary \undo and more to the index - is that worth an > >> entry in the tracker!? > > > A tracker? I'd just create a patch and submit it (and create the tr

Re: redundant entries in the indexes are confusing and lesseningthe clarity

James wrote Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:51 AM > On 01/02/14 10:14, Eluze wrote: >> add \single, \temporary \undo and more to the index - is that worth an >> entry in the tracker!? > A tracker? I'd just create a patch and submit it (and create the tracker > with git-cl for that patch). Oth

Re: redundant entries in the indexes are confusing and lessening the clarity

On 01/02/14 10:14, Eluze wrote: pkx166h wrote On 01/02/14 09:44, Eluze wrote: in NR 2.19.1 Appendix D + E, a lot of commands are listed /with/ and /without/ the backslash - this seems unnecessary some commands - eg. \single, \temporary and \undo - are only listed /without/ backslash imo comma

Re: redundant entries in the indexes are confusing and lessening the clarity

pkx166h wrote > On 01/02/14 09:44, Eluze wrote: >> in NR 2.19.1 Appendix D + E, a lot of commands are listed /with/ and >> /without/ the backslash - this seems unnecessary >> >> some commands - eg. \single, \temporary and \undo - are only listed >> /without/ backslash >> >> imo commands should alwa

Re: redundant entries in the indexes are confusing and lessening the clarity

James writes: > On 01/02/14 09:44, Eluze wrote: >> in NR 2.19.1 Appendix D + E, a lot of commands are listed /with/ and >> /without/ the backslash - this seems unnecessary >> >> some commands - eg. \single, \temporary and \undo - are only listed >> /without/ backslash >> >> imo commands should al

Re: redundant entries in the indexes are confusing and lessening the clarity

On 01/02/14 09:44, Eluze wrote: in NR 2.19.1 Appendix D + E, a lot of commands are listed /with/ and /without/ the backslash - this seems unnecessary some commands - eg. \single, \temporary and \undo - are only listed /without/ backslash imo commands should always be quoted including the backsl

redundant entries in the indexes are confusing and lessening the clarity

in NR 2.19.1 Appendix D + E, a lot of commands are listed /with/ and /without/ the backslash - this seems unnecessary some commands - eg. \single, \temporary and \undo - are only listed /without/ backslash imo commands should always be quoted including the backslash to make them quickly recogniza