Re: subtlety or remainder from other times?

2012-07-30 Thread Trevor Daniels
Eluze, you wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 9:19 PM > Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: >> >> On 2012-07-30 19:43, Trevor Daniels wrote: >>> >>> Eluze wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 4:01 PM >>> to me both \larger and \smaller are obsolete. or is there a subtlety I can't see? >>> \markup "" >>

Re: subtlety or remainder from other times?

2012-07-30 Thread Robin Bannister
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: The example had both \larger and \smaller in the same markup. Maybe a copy/paste typo? http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=07f53dbc18c8a8903fc8796029faa3ec3c0e707f Cheers, Robin ___ bug-li

Re: subtlety or remainder from other times?

2012-07-30 Thread -Eluze
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > On 2012-07-30 19:43, Trevor Daniels wrote: >> Eluze wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 4:01 PM >> >>> to me both \larger and \smaller are obsolete. or is there a subtlety I >>> can't >>> see? >> \markup "" >> \markup \larger "" >> >> shows a clear difference in siz

Re: subtlety or remainder from other times?

2012-07-30 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
On 2012-07-30 19:43, Trevor Daniels wrote: Eluze wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 4:01 PM to me both \larger and \smaller are obsolete. or is there a subtlety I can't see? \markup "" \markup \larger "" shows a clear difference in size here. Why do you think they are obsolete? The exampl

Re: subtlety or remainder from other times?

2012-07-30 Thread Trevor Daniels
Eluze wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 4:01 PM > to me both \larger and \smaller are obsolete. or is there a subtlety I can't > see? \markup "" \markup \larger "" shows a clear difference in size here. Why do you think they are obsolete? Some time ago we did change "\bigger" to "\larger".

subtlety or remainder from other times?

2012-07-30 Thread -Eluze
in NR, A.10 Text markup commands A.10.1 Font you find a description of these two commands: \larger arg (markup) Increase the font size relative to the current setting. \smaller arg (markup) Decrease the font size relative to the current setting. and in titling-init.ly there is \fill-li

Fwd: Re: scheme spanner in input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly not quote-proof

2012-07-30 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Original Message Subject: Re: scheme spanner in input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly not quote-proof Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:32:20 +0200 From: David Kastrup Organization: Organization?!? To: lilypond-de...@gnu.org Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > The text spanner implement

Fwd: scheme spanner in input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly not quote-proof

2012-07-30 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
According to David's response (which I will also forward from -devel), the problem is that the addQuote (and the part-combiner) use a Global context from the moment the part-combiner is initialized rather than when addQuote is called. Thus the Global context is missing information about the new gro