Eluze, you wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 9:19 PM
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-07-30 19:43, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>>>
>>> Eluze wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 4:01 PM
>>>
>>>> to me both \larger and \smaller are obsolete. or is there a subtlety I
>>>> can't
>>>> see?
>>> \markup "aaaa"
>>> \markup \larger "aaaa"
>>>
>>> shows a clear difference in size here. Why do you think
>>> they are obsolete?
>>
>> The example had both \larger and \smaller in the same markup. It seems
>> that their effects really cancel:
>>
>> \markup "aaaa"
>> \markup \larger \smaller "aaaa"
>
> yep - and I also don't understand the lines 36 - 39:
>
> \huge \larger \bold
> \fill-line {
> \larger \fromproperty #'header:title
> }
OK, I see what you mean now. I was confused by your use
of "obsolete".
> why are the font determining commands both outside and inside of the
> \fill-line?
Probably a copy error too, as Robin as suggested.
> this might be confusing for users (probably writing \huge \larger \larger
> \bold might also be confusing)
>
> IMO specially the files where users are pointed to should have a simple and
> clearly understandable syntax!
>
> shall I add an issue tomorrow?
Yes please. Then we can take it from there (but say they are "redundant" :)
Trevor
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
