On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:47:46PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> It seems like my attempts to forward this and my replies to the bug
> list failed to get through, so here they are again.
Thanks for fowarding the report, Trevor.
>
> Here's the original bug report:
>
> - Original Message
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:13:46AM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember that I used to click an example in the doc and see the
> text file in the browser window. Now I'm prompted with a window
> which asks me which application I should use.
Thanks for the report, Federico.
I agree w
My second reply, identifying a possible source of the bug.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Trevor Daniels" ; "David Stocker"
;
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Repeat Dots and Staff Size in 2.15.41
>
> Trevor Daniels wrote Sunday, July 08, 2
My first reply, identifying this bug as a regression ...
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "David Stocker" ;
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: Repeat Dots and Staff Size in 2.15.41
> Damn! Another regression. (Sorry, David, I'm not
> swearing at you - in
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 02:46:28PM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2012/7/9 Simon Albrecht :
> > %% When using \parenthesize on whole bar or multi measure rests, no
> > parentheses
> >
> > %% will be printed:
> >
> > \version "2.14.2"
> >
> > \paper { ragged-right=##t }
> >
> > \parenthesize R1
Than
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:09:50AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:16:52AM -0700, -Eluze wrote:
> > It _is_ attacked from another starting point -- by explaining as
> > much as possible with working examples.
>
> If I have twenty relevant va
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
>
> "-Eluze" wrote in message
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Da Mota Sam wrote:
>>> I'm a pretty much new user of lilypond and I have an idea for a almost
>>> dummy new feature: automatically attach lilypond code in pdf.
>>> With p
> Not sure about translations. But if it is "one over the denominator" in
> English, you should _write_ "one over the denominator" rather than "the
> one over denominator".
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2644
new patch added to the tracker.
Frédéric
___
-Eluze writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> What's wrong with using input-file-name ? This should work for the main
>> input file. If you need more than that, you can likely work with
>> something like
>>
>> #(read-hash-extend #\< (lambda (c p) (port-filename p)))
>>
>> #(display #<)
David Kastrup wrote:
>
>
>
> What's wrong with using input-file-name ? This should work for the main
> input file. If you need more than that, you can likely work with
> something like
>
> #(read-hash-extend #\< (lambda (c p) (port-filename p)))
>
> #(display #<)
>
> This will not work be
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> If you open it in
No need for that, evince shows the attachment fine.
It would be nice if we could do this directly through GhostScript
or a PostScript command.
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Ava
2012/7/9 Simon Albrecht :
> %% When using \parenthesize on whole bar or multi measure rests, no
> parentheses
>
> %% will be printed:
>
> \version "2.14.2"
>
> \paper { ragged-right=##t }
>
> \parenthesize R1
>
>
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-
On 2012-07-09 10:49, Phil Holmes wrote:
"-Eluze" wrote in message
news:34131686.p...@talk.nabble.com...
Bernard Hurley-2 wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:12:40PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
Hi,
I'm a pretty much new user of lilypond and I have an idea for a almost
dummy new feature: automa
-Eluze writes:
> Phil Holmes-2 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> the basic function in LilyPond is given with
>>>
>>> \include "test.ly"
>>> \markup \verbatim-file #"test.ly"
>>>
>>> now I don't know what you mean with automatically - should it be attached
>>> every time? on a new page, in another (pdf) fil
Phil Holmes-2 wrote:
>
>
>>
>> the basic function in LilyPond is given with
>>
>> \include "test.ly"
>> \markup \verbatim-file #"test.ly"
>>
>> now I don't know what you mean with automatically - should it be attached
>> every time? on a new page, in another (pdf) file?
>>
>> or did you mean so
%% When using \parenthesize on whole bar or multi measure rests, no
parentheses
%% will be printed:
\version "2.14.2"
\paper { ragged-right=##t }
\parenthesize R1
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li
Le 09/07/2012, Phil Holmes disait :
[...]
Hi,
I'm a pretty much new user of lilypond and I have an idea for a
almost dummy new feature: automatically attach lilypond code in
pdf. With pdf files it is possible to attach a file into it.
What a great idea!
the basic function in LilyPond is giv
"-Eluze" wrote in message
news:34131686.p...@talk.nabble.com...
Bernard Hurley-2 wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:12:40PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
Hi,
I'm a pretty much new user of lilypond and I have an idea for a almost
dummy new feature: automatically attach lilypond code in pdf.
With
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:15:27AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Colin Hall writes:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 06:27:04PM +, Micha wrote:
> >> In NR 2.14.2 (and 2.15) section 3.5 (MIDI Output) there is a small typo.
> >>
> >> In the sentence "Standard MIDI oputput is somewhat crude" it sh
19 matches
Mail list logo
