David Kastrup wrote: > > > > What's wrong with using input-file-name ? This should work for the main > input file. If you need more than that, you can likely work with > something like > > #(read-hash-extend #\< (lambda (c p) (port-filename p))) > > #(display #<) > > This will not work before 2.15.twentyish (when I decided that the > terrible error messages for Scheme code were not doing anybody a favor, > and made port-filename, port-line, and port-column point to sensible > locations). > >
this only lacks to be mentioned somewhere in the docs! great! - are there other such undocumented variables? Eluze -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Fwd%3A--Feature-request--attach-lilypond-code-in-pdf.-tp34131613p34134198.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
