Comment #19 on issue 687 by chicagogrooves: Enhancement: inequal MIDI
quantization of equal durations (swing, rubato)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=687
Incidentally, I changed the invocation of swing to the following, and
tested that it works for both 8th and 16th note
Comment #2 on issue 849 by x.scheuer: Rests should not keep staves alive
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=849
\RemoveEmptyStaffContext has been reworked recently isn't it?
Couldn't a dev start working on this issue thanks to Nicolas' code or
Reinhold's instructions?
Many thank
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 07:03:07PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> "Graham Percival" wrote in message
> news:aanlktiks6pdt9yzbocgcmhtxpsrkazpzo3n09tmfi...@mail.gmail.com...
> >If anybody doesn't like this sacrifice of quality, then step forward
> >and offer to do Bug Squad work.
>
> I have been watch
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Labels: -fixed_2_13_32
Comment #2 on issue 1232 by PhilEHolmes: Misplaced tremolo in tablatures
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1232
Not fixed, AFAICS. There are simply no tremolos on the tablature now.
Attachments:
TremTab2.
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 14:49:16 (GMT) you wrote:
> Replace it by
>
> \override TimeSignature #'X-offset =
> #ly:self-alignment-interface::x-aligned-on-self
>
> (on the same one line) and the code compiles and give the correct
> result without errors.
>
Thanks a lot Xavier,
Sorry for th
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 14:49:16 (GMT) you wrote:
> Replace it by
>
> \override TimeSignature #'X-offset =
> #ly:self-alignment-interface::x-aligned-on-self
>
> (on the same one line) and the code compiles and give the correct
> result without errors.
>
Thanks a lot Xavier
On 7 September 2010 16:35, Matthieu Jacquot wrote:
>
> Since the 2.13.28 (at least) it seems to have a problem with the
> vertical placement of the bar numbers and rehearsal marks (2.12 is fine).
> I'm trying this code, slightly modified from the LSR code (without the
> Rehearsal Marks) http://lsr
Since the 2.13.28 (at least) it seems to have a problem with the vertical
placement of the bar numbers and rehearsal marks (2.12 is fine).
I'm trying this code, slightly modified from the LSR code (without the
Rehearsal
Marks) http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=272
\layout {
\context {
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> "Patrick McCarty" wrote in message
> > I do struggle to find the correct command line syntax. a) Why is if -fpng
> for one graphics option and -dbackend=svg for another?
That's one of our not-in-the-tracker bugs.
> I also
> think these (at
"Patrick McCarty" wrote in message
news:aanlktikjdsesusmfkcpjhsoxfsfhefbo0fhvzyzko...@mail.gmail.com...
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
"Graham Percival" wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
FWIW I don't think it can be verified in Windows, since I
Comment #32 on issue 684 by percival.music.ca: Enhancement: MetronomeMark
should support break-align-symbols
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=684
I do not think that adding "paid for" signs in our code is appropriate.
I do, however, very much approve of bounty offers includ
Comment #31 on issue 684 by jan.nieuwenhuizen: Enhancement: MetronomeMark
should support break-align-symbols
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=684
Now that this bug is *really* fixed, we have to handle bounties.
Jordi: E 50 (paid to Jan)
Xavier: E 60 (paid to Jan)
12 matches
Mail list logo
