Re: Issue 1152 in lilypond: Regression: collisions with accidentals

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #14 on issue 1152 by joeneeman: Regression: collisions with accidentals http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152 By the way, the following is a minimal example for Reinhold's bug: \version "2.12.0" \layout { \context { \Score \override SpacingSpanner #'commo

Re: Issue 1152 in lilypond: Regression: collisions with accidentals

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #13 on issue 1152 by joeneeman: Regression: collisions with accidentals http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152 This is a different bug and not a regression (2.12.3 gives the same behavior). It is tricky to fix because the cause is a cyclic dependency: we cannot fo

Re: Issue 442 in lilypond: Enhancement: RemoveEmptyStaffContext shouldn't reduce PianoStaff to one staff

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #10 on issue 442 by joeneeman: Enhancement: RemoveEmptyStaffContext shouldn't reduce PianoStaff to one staff http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=442 Dynamic is hard, for the same reason that you can't \override VerticalAxisGroup in the middle of a piece: the engraver

Re: Issue 442 in lilypond: Enhancement: RemoveEmptyStaffContext shouldn't reduce PianoStaff to one staff

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #9 on issue 442 by tdanielsmusic: Enhancement: RemoveEmptyStaffContext shouldn't reduce PianoStaff to one staff http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=442 My preference (of Neil's suggestions) is for the action to be based on a property of the staff grouping, set by defa

Re: Issue 1152 in lilypond: Regression: collisions with accidentals

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Accepted Comment #12 on issue 1152 by reinhold.kainhofer: Regression: collisions with accidentals http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152 (No comment was entered for this change.) ___ bug-lilypond mailing l

Re: Issue 1152 in lilypond: Regression: collisions with accidentals

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #11 on issue 1152 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: Regression: collisions with accidentals http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152 Also this reminded me of something I had seen recently, and I apologise is this not the same issue I am getting collisions on 2.13.29 here: \re

Re: Issue 442 in lilypond: Enhancement: RemoveEmptyStaffContext shouldn't reduce PianoStaff to one staff

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #8 on issue 442 by n.puttock: Enhancement: RemoveEmptyStaffContext shouldn't reduce PianoStaff to one staff http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=442 I'm afraid I agree with David here, even though the patch looks pretty good. This behaviour should be the default for a P

Re: Issue 1152 in lilypond: Regression: collisions with accidentals

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #10 on issue 1152 by pnorcks: Regression: collisions with accidentals http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152 Don't know why the previous attachment is not inlined... Attachments: snip.png 6.3 KB ___ bug-lilypond

Re: Issue 1194 in lilypond: Dynamics are differently positioned on rests than on notes

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 1194 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Dynamics are differently positioned on rests than on notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1194 As I'm also very interested in a solution to this problem I copy a message by Neil Puttock on bug-lilypond: "This is the

Re: Issue 1194 in lilypond: Dynamics are differently positioned on rests than on notes

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 1194 by reinhold.kainhofer: Dynamics are differently positioned on rests than on notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1194 That problem (or at least the solution) is probably slightly different, because with dynamics on skips, there is no Grob on whic

Re: Issue 1194 in lilypond: Dynamics are differently positioned on rests than on notes

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 1194 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Dynamics are differently positioned on rests than on notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1194 The related issue seems to be issue #620 ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lil

Re: Issue 1152 in lilypond: Regression: collisions with accidentals

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #9 on issue 1152 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: Regression: collisions with accidentals http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152 Here is the png file (preferred over pdf) Attachments: snip.PNG 15.5 KB ___ bug-lilypond mai

Re: Dynamics differently positioned on rests than on notes

2010-07-23 Thread Neil Puttock
On 23 July 2010 16:01, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > I'm running into a problem with a score there lots of dynamic signs are placed > on a rest at the beginning of a measure. These dynamics are placed too far to > the left, causing them to collide with the barline... > > Attached is an example. > Is

Re: Issue 1194 in lilypond: Dynamics are differently positioned on rests than on notes

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 1194 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Dynamics are differently positioned on rests than on notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1194 I assume this problem - reported by guess who ;-) - is also related or identical: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-l

Re: Issue 1152 in lilypond: Regression: collisions with accidentals

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #8 on issue 1152 by reinhold.kainhofer: Regression: collisions with accidentals http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152 I'm still running into collisions of accidentals with rests in 2.13.29... Attached is a sample file (from a real project I'm working on right now)

Re: Issue 1194 in lilypond: Dynamics are differently positioned on rests than on notes

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 1194 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Dynamics are differently positioned on rests than on notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1194 Sorry, forgot the example code ... \version "2.13.28" mus = \relative c'' { \time 2/4 a2 | r8\p a[ a a] |

Re: Dynamics differently positioned on rests than on notes

2010-07-23 Thread Urs Liska
I slightly "tiny-ized" your example and added it to the tracker: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1194 Best Urs Am 23.07.2010 17:01, schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer: I'm running into a problem with a score there lots of dynamic signs are placed on a rest at the beginning of a meas

Issue 1194 in lilypond: Dynamics are differently positioned on rests than on notes

2010-07-23 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Collision Priority-Low New issue 1194 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Dynamics are differently positioned on rests than on notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1194 Reported by Reinhold Kainhofer: "The dynamics in the following exampl

Dynamics differently positioned on rests than on notes

2010-07-23 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
I'm running into a problem with a score there lots of dynamic signs are placed on a rest at the beginning of a measure. These dynamics are placed too far to the left, causing them to collide with the barline... Attached is an example. Isn't this a bug? Cheers, Reinhold -- -