Issue 569 in lilypond: Consistency in property names: beam-thickness

2009-08-14 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #7 on issue 569 by frederic...@m4x.org: Consistency in property names: beam-thickness http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=569 Sorry for that. As soon as the tests passed I though it was OK. Can you give me some directions on where are the files I have to change? Then

Issue 569 in lilypond: Consistency in property names: beam-thickness

2009-08-14 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #6 on issue 569 by n.puttock: Consistency in property names: beam-thickness http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=569 Frédéric, the convert rule is for the wrong version (2.13.1). I've moved it to the end of the rules for 2.13.4 and added a description. There are sti

Issue 569 in lilypond: Consistency in property names: beam-thickness

2009-08-14 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_4 Comment #5 on issue 569 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Consistency in property names: beam-thickness http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=569 Oops -- sorry for doing it wrong. I think it's right now -- You received this message

Issue 569 in lilypond: Consistency in property names: beam-thickness

2009-08-14 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: fixed_2_13_4 Comment #4 on issue 569 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Consistency in property names: beam-thickness http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=569 Thanks to Frederic for his work! -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC field

Enhancement request: Automatic glissando marks in chords

2009-08-14 Thread Patrick Schmidt
Dear developers, as I quite often engrave Rock Riffs I discovered that it is comparatively complicated to typeset chord slides (using hidden voices and spacer notes). From my point of view it would be more intuitive if it were possible to set glissandi in chords just the way ties are set,

Enhancement request: automatic polyphony in TabStaff context

2009-08-14 Thread Patrick Schmidt
Dear developers, thank you all for Lilypond! I'm very fond of it. While trying to engrave a piece with polyphonic elements both "traditionally" (with noteheads) and with tablature I found out that it is not possible to get the tablature right with the following code: \version "2.13.3" poly

Re: [frogs] PATCH for getting output-suffix to work (Trackers 714 and 404)

2009-08-14 Thread Valentin Villenave
2009/8/12 Ian Hulin : > There's a restriction with the gs back-end. Marek asked abourt this and > Han-Wen confirmed that's why we're restricted to ujsing the ASCII set for > filenames.  So we'll have to stick to work-rounds like "Floete" and > "Hoerner" in the suffix names. Could this be related t

Issue 830 in lilypond: Task: rename feta filenames in English

2009-08-14 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: Accepted Owner: v.villenave Labels: Type-Task Maintainability New issue 830 by v.villenave: Task: rename feta filenames in English http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=830 Mark Polesky has suggested that the following filenames should be translated: feta-eindelij

Issue 829 in lilypond: split Metafont output into smaller units

2009-08-14 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 829 by v.villenave: split Metafont output into smaller units http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=829 Invalid as requested by Werner: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-08/msg00599.html -- You received this