2008/5/13 karim haddad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It works only if the beams are implicitly expressed with [ and ] .
Hi Karim,
I can't remember having seen this documented anywhere... Can you post
a small code example that produces both results (the one that works,
and the one that doesn't work)?
2008/5/14 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I just amended ottava-bracket.cc with your
> changes, then recompiled.
Ah. That makes sense now. I did wonder how you managed to do that.
> If you like, I'll send a patch with your changes to -devel, though I
> can't guarantee that it will be appro
Issue 461: enharmonic ties
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=461
Comment #7 by n.puttock:
I suppose both examples might be considered slightly cryptic, though
there is only
one place in both which could be a tie (the C sharp -> D flat).
The key signature is F sharp major.
-
Issue 591: Left edge of hairpin aligns with arpeggio
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=591
Comment #7 by n.puttock:
Joe: yeah, there's no problem with that; again I had misunderstood
Mats's post.
Basically, I'd assumed that using
\new Staff << \upper \dynamics >>
is the same
2008/5/13 Matthew Rowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Which version are you using? I just tried .43 and .45 and I didn't get
> any leading vertical line - I copy/pasted your code and then ran it
> through Lilypond...
Sorry; I suppose what I posted might appear to be somewhat of a tease,
but I ass
Hi
PLease sorry for my last post:
Hi
Apparently in \version "2.11.46"
\once \override Beam #'positions doesn't work . Only the
\override will.
But how can we go back to the default setting then ?
Or am i missing something here ?
THanx
K
It works only if the beams are implicitly ex
Hi
Apparently in \version "2.11.46"
\once \override Beam #'positions doesn't work . Only the
\override will.
But how can we go back to the default setting then ?
Or am i missing something here ?
THanx
K
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lily
2008/5/13 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/5/12 Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > oops... Pressed the wrong button. I meant to add:
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that this reproduces the previous behaviour for RIGHT
> edges, and
> > adds the same capabilities for LEFT. Redundant computat
2008/5/13 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/5/12 Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Attached is the output of the following snippet:
>
> \version "2.11.46"
> \layout { ragged-right = ##t }
> \relative c' {
>
> \override Staff.OttavaBracket #'edge-height = #'(1.2 . 1.2)
> \ov
On Tue, 13 May 2008 09:33:30 +0200
"Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/13 Matthew Rowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > \version "2.11.46"
> > The 2.11.46 would be the issue there (where did you get that
> > from?).
>
> Latest is .45 but GDP docs state .46 in front cover.
At some
2008/5/13 Matthew Rowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > \version "2.11.46"
> The 2.11.46 would be the issue there (where did you get that from?).
Latest is .45 but GDP docs state .46 in front cover.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
_
Issue 591: Left edge of hairpin aligns with arpeggio
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=591
Comment #6 by v.villenave:
OK, everyone can now refer to Issue 620.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Verified
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or
2008/5/13 George Macon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In this snippet, the tail of the first f in the fff goes over the bar line to
> its left. I originally noticed this in a PianoStaff, but it occurs in
> GrandStaff
> as well. This problem occurs when short duration notes come after the bar
> line.
Issue 621: Dynamics should avoid cross-staff BarLines (e.g. GrandStaff,
PianoStaff etc)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=621
New issue report by v.villenave:
% When short durations occur after a bar line, dynamics
% can collide with the BarLine.
\version "2.11.45"
\new GrandS
14 matches
Mail list logo
