dynamic/whole note tremolo

2005-08-17 Thread Graham Percival
Dynamics do not avoid the flags/beams from a whole note tremolo, but they avoid the stem in a half note tremolo. \version "2.7.5" { b'1:32\mp \break b'2:32\mp } ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Fa noteheads

2005-08-17 Thread Will Fitzgerald
2.7.5-1 (Mac OS X prebuilt image) seems to have fixed the problems. Thanks! Will Fitzgerald On 8/12/05, Will Fitzgerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Using lilypad on Mac OS X (binary installation), which I got from the > website today > > 2.6.3 still has the same problem. > > 2.7.4 fixed the pr

Re: U of Waterloo ftp site not up to date and other issues

2005-08-17 Thread Kris Shaffer
The most "straightforward way" to build Lilypond on Mac OS X now is to download the DMG package directly from Lilypond (new with 2.6.x--well, actually the late 2.5.x builds). You install it just like a typical Mac app: mount the image and drag the program to /Applications. It also comes w

Re: Certain code not rendering in 2.6

2005-08-17 Thread Mats Bengtsson
So, there's a problem with the font handling in your installation. Did you mention exactly what Linux distribution you used and how you installed LilyPond (from source, using the generic Linux installer or some specific package). If you search the mailing list archives (also of lilypond-user and

Re: Certain code not rendering in 2.6

2005-08-17 Thread Nathan Curry
>Could you split these problem reports > into separate emails A couple problems got resolved by my client, but here's a better example. The file morganlied.ly from http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/examples.html renders most of the music correctly. This is not quite separate problem reports, but it se

Re: Missing Rests

2005-08-17 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 08.23, Graham Percival wrote: > On 16-Aug-05, at 10:01 PM, Will Oram wrote: > > It's getting better, but lilypond sometimes just leaves bars in > > combined part lines blank. An example: > > Interesting; it's prompted by using R1*x. In this smaller example, > using the

Re: pdf display (was Re: evince doesn't display 3's)

2005-08-17 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
D Josiah Boothby wrote: For the sake of completeness, I set the default version of ghostscript to gs-gpl, ran the file through lilypond again, then viewed the file with all of the pdf viewers that are on my system (which I believe to be all of the pdf viewers available through the standard debi

pdf display (was Re: evince doesn't display 3's)

2005-08-17 Thread D Josiah Boothby
For the sake of completeness, I set the default version of ghostscript to gs-gpl, ran the file through lilypond again, then viewed the file with all of the pdf viewers that are on my system (which I believe to be all of the pdf viewers available through the standard debian repositories). Acrob

Re: evince doesn't display 3's

2005-08-17 Thread D Josiah Boothby
Graham Percival wrote: On 16-Aug-05, at 8:03 PM, D Josiah Boothby wrote: Using the 2.6.0 autopackage on Debian sarge/sid, Evince (v. 0.3.0) doesn't display the 3's in the time signatures. Please file a bug report with evince, then. (?) Looking more carefully I don't know if -- or how t