Re: Analysis of build failures in Debian GNU/Hurd

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:41:53PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > - PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP: 4 > > Actually fixed in hurd's CVS head. > > > - SOUND_MIXER_*: 4 > > Mmm, should be fixed with the soundcard.h we now ship in debian. Ah, OK. > It's odd we don't have it. IIRC we have a

Re: [bug #17644] glibc: support for TLS

On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 02:09:13PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Here are updated patches, ext2fs.static now works. mach-defpager doesn't, > however. I get "Assertion `ports->ip_srights > 0' failed in file "../ipc/ipc_right.c", line 1411" when I run your hurd/libc0.3 packages in qemu, see the at

Re: [bug #17644] glibc: support for TLS

On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 06:22:05PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hello! > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 05:19:59PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 02:09:13PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Here are updated patches, ext2fs.static now work

Re: New Hurd wiki?

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:46:16PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: > The Hurd wiki at hurd.gnufangs.org no longer is updated It's getting updated sporadically, at least from me. Michael ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.or

New VFS being developped for glib/Gnome

Hi, just wanted to point out this presentation done by Alexander Larsson (RedHat) this week at GUADEC on GVFS: http://www.gnome.org/~alexl/presentations/guadec2007-gvfs.odp (temporary PDF version: http://oussik.com/guadec2007-gvfs.pdf ) The code is at http://www.gnome.org/~alexl/git/gvfs.git/ (

Re: New VFS being developped for glib/Gnome

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 12:02:09PM -0400, Gregg C Levine wrote: > For those of us who are familiar with the other stored resource methods for > storing code, such as subversion, and CVS, but not very familiar with GIT, > please elaborate on how to retrieve the files stored there. It's not like I'm

Re: Maintenance of the Hurd parts in glibc (was: about GNU Hurd)

Hi, On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:49:12PM +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Maybe it would help to lower entry barriers for the project. A > distributed version control helps technically. What I think is most important is that people can easily locally branch/merge the master (CVS) repository with thei

Re: Maintenance of the Hurd parts in glibc (was: about GNU Hurd)

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 12:59:39PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > It would be a good idea to have SVN running on the Hurd before > switching. It is running, at least svn+ssh:// works fine for me. I have also just uploaded subversion packages to ftp.debian.org, they should be available to Debi

Re: switching to SVN ?

Hi, On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:25:34PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > You may question: ``Who needs five checkouts of the same source code?'' > I do. I have five of the Hurd's HEAD, fourteen of GNU Mach's > gnumach-1-branch, four of glibc. Every one with different patches and > changes. Switch

Re: git for Debian GNU/Hurd (was: Setting ones's priorities)

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:58:02AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Michael, again, please apply these two attached patches to the Debian > `git' package, build and upload. Thanks, I've uploaded it to gnuab. I didn't test it though. Michael ___ Bug

Re: Build Hurd toolchain

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:05:20AM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > - On 10/30/07, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | As building a proper cross compiler is not trivial (as you are > | experiencing), may I ask why you need to build one? > \-- > > So that I can compile (or cross-compi

Re: Build Hurd toolchain

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 04:10:02PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:55:42PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > > "azeem" referred this documentation on IRC: > > http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/unsorted/BuildingTheHurd/index.html > > > > I shall give it a try. > > I removed it

Re: Making DHCP renew work in pfinet

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:03:49PM +0200, Christian Dietrich wrote: > * Stefan Siegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Oct 15 2007 23:57] wrote: > > > But now, when the /etc/dhclient-script calls fsysopts it will override > > > all other device informations, e.g. ipv6 addresses, gateways on other > > > devices.

pfinet segfaults (was: Re: Making DHCP renew work in pfinet)

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:03:49PM +0200, Christian Dietrich wrote: > * Stefan Siegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Oct 15 2007 23:57] wrote: > > > The whitespaces beetween -a and the ip are missing because -a, -g, -m, > > > -p, -A, -G have only optional arguments. If the argument is no passed > > > the valu

Re: What after cross_gnu?

On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 04:27:20PM +, Ashish Gokhale wrote: > Thanks to thomas for the cross_gnu_env & cross_gnu. I > have been able to run both. Now I have cross-build > environment. How do i proceed to have a running Hurd > System? any links? Install the Hurd, either natively or as a qemu in

Re: gcc/toolchain Hurd maintenance

Hi, On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 06:20:14PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > I would like to hear some pointers to get started on how binutils, > GCC, glibc, Hurd servers, etc. are collaborating in a Hurd system? > ('toolchain maintenance') Binutils and GCC do not work much differently than on GNU/Linux

Re: L4-Hurd or Debian/Hurd

On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:59:08PM +, Ashish Gokhale wrote: > There seem to be two ports of Hurd emerging, one is > Debian/Hurd running on Gnu Mach kernel & another > Gnu/Hurd running on top of L4 microkernel. > > 1. Which flavor of Hurd does this mailing list belong? > 2. Which is more compl

Re: FOSDEM 2008

On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 05:27:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There is always some uncertainty in such matters. But I have little > doubt we could get a reasonable number of people together *if* somebody > would actually take up organising it. It's all about taking initiative. > However it s

Re: GSoC application deadline passed

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:16:31PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Fri 14 Mar 2008 15:08:31 +0100, a écrit : > > Now to a real issue. While there's nothing wrong with the project as > > such (in fact it's quite a good idea), I think most of the project is > > more in the do

Re: GSoC application deadline passed

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 03:58:33PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > * Setup a blog and write your commit messages in there. If there is a git (or > mercurial) repository, also add a link to its web frontend on the website. > People must see, that the Hurd is active. A developer blog (i.e.

Re: GSoC application deadline passed

Forgot to reply to this part. On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 03:58:33PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > El Friday, 14 de March de 2008 15:08:31 Carl Fredrik Hammar escribió: > > Now to a real issue. While there's nothing wrong with the project as > > such (in fact it's quite a good idea), I think

Package installability and testing (was: Re: GSoC application deadline passed)

(CCing debian-hurd as this is really Debian-specific now) On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 01:15:27PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 18/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Michal Suchanek, le Mon 17 Mar 2008 16:34:42 +0100, a écrit : > > > > > On 17/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL

Re: GSoC application deadline passed

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:38:51AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If the Hurd gets at least one slot, you'll have contributed as much as > > anyone who regularly dives into code, because you'll have invited a > > new coder. > > Most likely we could have got one slot again through the GNU pro

Re: GSoC application deadline passed

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 03:14:53PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Something along the lines of this? > >The Hurd project has been accepted as a mentoring organisation for href="http://code.google.com/soc/2008/";>Google Summer of Code >2008! If you are a student and looking for a job

Re: Debian Hurd package dependencies [Was: GSoC application deadline passed]

Please follow-up to debian-hurd, this is really off-topic on bug-hurd. On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:07:12PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > Would setting up more buildds help with this issue? With current boom > of virtualization setting up an obsolete system becomes quite easy ;-) > Plus you get th

Re: Spreading the word (was: GSoC application deadline passed)

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 04:39:44PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:48:50AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > > What is to be done now is waiting to see whether I^Hwe get accepted. > > > > We've been. > [...] > > Is there someone to write a short note to be installed

Re: Release notes (was: GSoC application deadline passed)

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 03:59:47PM +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Clearly, documentation is a problem with the Hurd. It's incomplete, > scattered and stale. Working on it is helpful, if done appropriately. In any case, IMHO the most useful documentation improvements would be in the Hurd manual and

Re: Python Script to Retrieve the Uptime

On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:50:32PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Just to make sure: you know that there is already a tarfs lying around? > (I can't remember where) It's on hurdextras, see http://sv.gnu.org/p/hurdextras and http://cvs.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/tarfs/?root=hurdextras Michael

Re: Revision control

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:34:41PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > I like the idea. > > It would lower the barrier to begin coding on the hurd (I think), and it > would > be a good opportunity to clean up the cvs chaos a bit (so newcomers don't get > completely lost in the different repos

Re: Revision control

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:11:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No powerful tool can be properly used without understanding it. The point is: The Hurd doesn't need a powerful source control tool, it just needs something which is much better than CVS and usable by all possible contributors. O

[patch #6088] Entropy Patch

Additional Item Attachment, patch #6088 (project hurd): File name: entropy_patch.diff Size:28 KB ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message se

[patch #6088] Entropy Patch

Follow-up Comment #1, patch #6088 (project hurd): Comments on the 2007/08/28 version of the patch by Samuel Thibault: > Index: device/blkio.c > @@ -149,6 +151,10 @@ > do { > prev = next; > next = prev->io_next; > +#ifdef MACH_ENTROPY > + /* Let's grab the cylind

Re: RPC implementation - Help me please

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:23:36AM +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote: > apt-get source glibc and dpkg-buildpackage -uc -B fails for some weird > compilation errors in bsd files. I forgot to log the errors. Is this a known > bug or is it necessary to give the build logs to find out what it is? Luckily, g

Re: New Newsitem for Savannah

Hi, On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:18:58PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > The newsitem just says: "News are on the main website (link) and in the wiki > (link). > > Should I activate it myself? That doesn't sound urgent, so we can wait till Thomas Schwinge has time I guess, he's doing most

Re: Current state of Xorg on Hurd?

Hi, On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 02:31:24PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Dienstag 02 September 2008 11:43:39 schrieb Neal H. Walfield: > > At Tue, 2 Sep 2008 10:15:41 +0200, > > Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > > * For Desktops: Are pthreads fully implemented, now? Can I get KDE or > > > si

Re: Code Bounty

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 08:10:56PM +1200, Gregory Plummer wrote: > Hi all, I would like to offer a small cash incentive for tasks needing to be > completed. It would be great if the Hurd could support file systems greater > than 2 GB in size. How would I go about sponsoring this feature? Some input

[bug #24278] bad number magic 0 (should be 0xef53)

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #24278 (project hurd): > start (hd0,0)/hurd/ext2fs.static: ext2fs: device:hd0s0 hd0s0 is not a valid device name. Fix your grub config. Michael ___ Reply to this item at:

Re: Current state of Xorg on Hurd?

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:10:35AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Dienstag 16 September 2008 17:07:15 schrieb Thomas Schwinge: > > date: 2003-11-09 20:13:47 +0100; author: tomhart; state: Exp; lines: > > OK, then it's clear why it doesn't work :) > > 5 years is a hell of a lot o

Re: [META] Replying to messages, again

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:34:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sorry, but no. The list-reply feature of Mutt is there to be used, and > I'm going to use it. Personally, I try to hit 'g' if the person I reply to is unknown to me and it a new message (not in the middle of a thread), otherwise

Re: Xen - exec hanging

On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:10:55PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > Should have checked. Anyways, it booted fine. The console response is > quite good! > > I put some documentation here: > http://www.shakthimaan.com/installs/hurd-xen.html Pretty please, with sugar on top, don't make up more docume

dbus porting required

Hello, now that we have a working /proc tree, we discovered that the dbus daemon is not starting up correctly: Setting up dbus (1.2.1-3) ... The system user `messagebus' already exists. Exiting. Starting system message bus: dbusFailed to start message bus: Failed to bind socket "/var/run/dbus/sy

current CVS libpthread makes trivial programs linked to it hang

Hi, if you compile a trivial program and link it to libpthread from current CVS, it hangs. I bisected it mostly to the following change: 2008-06-22 Neal H. Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * sysdeps/generic/pt-mutex-timedlock.c (__pthread_mutex_timedlock_internal) [! NDEBUG]: Set

Re: e2os

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 06:51:18PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > It's safe, it just sets a bit somewhere. It'd be nice if it was part of e2fsprogs or something; it's more useful on GNU/Linux than on GNU/Hurd anyway usually. Did somebody try to get it integrated there at some point? Michael

Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhauldebian/rules)

On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I went about this yesterday, and discovered that tetex-bin isn't usable > in the archive. I think I've uploaded a tetex-bin build some time ago. Does it look like a build problem or are there bugs in the package? I guess I could try

Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhauldebian/rules)

On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 04:41:51PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 06:47:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > > If someone beats me to it, then great. > > > > no chance, still on exams (and lucky that i found a

Re: ruby 1.8

w, so building stuff that's not in the archive yet to to see whether it builds cleanly makes sense right now, IMHO. > btw thanks to Michael Banck for fixing them! I was too busy to get into > it back then :) I just reported them. Kudos to the debian ruby maintai

Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch]

On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:08:51AM +0100, Greg Buchholz wrote: > Alright, here's a better patch with ChangeLog entries and with the > return values changed to EOPNOTSUPP. I don't want to be picky here, but it's better to provide the ChangeLog outside of the diff. ChangeLogs are very likely t

Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report

On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:03:58AM -0700, James Michael DuPont wrote: > > No it doesn't. > > No it isn't. > > Looks like you have been watching too much Monty Python : [...] > It is too boring to argue with you. Do you know AMS well enough or are you just thin-skinned? ;) I was a bit surprised a

Re: gpc build failure on the Hurd

bug-hurd: Could somebody please take a look at this? On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 03:00:04AM +0100, Frank Heckenbach wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:26:48AM +0100, Frank Heckenbach wrote: > > > I suppose so. If you can get the arguments and return value of the > > > libc function select() (it sho

Re: Support for D-Link DFE 528-TX and 538-TX

On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:24:38AM +, Gianluca Guida wrote: > Anthony Ventimiglia wrote a trivial patch, back in July 2002, > that added support in the gnumach-1x branch for Dlink DFE 538 TX > (and actually works even on DFE 528 TX). Since they are common > rtl8139 NIC (and I have many of the

Re: comiling error in exec

On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 09:12:00PM +0600, Dmitry V. Zhulanov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:07:56PM +0100, M. Gerards wrote: > > Thanks for this report. It seems that Roland commited some patches: > > > > http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/hurd/hurd/exec/ChangeLog?rev=1.63&content-type=

Re: comiling error in exec

On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:24:58PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >> I was thinking more along the lines so that the user will know >> that he/she is using a old version of libc. Because otherwise we >> would have to add each feature we depend on into our >> configure.in. > >O

[patch] GNU Mach-1.x support for 3c556 NIC

Hi, this patch adds support in GNU Mach 1.x for the 3Com 3c556 chip, as found in my notebook. I've extracted it from Linux-2.2, and it seems to work well :) I hope the ChangeLog entry is alright, feel free to correct me. 2004-02-15 Michael Banck <[EMAIL P

Re: [linux 2.6 patch] ext2 support for hurd extensions via xattr interface

On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:19:42PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > If people find this useful, then I can try my luck at getting this > incorporated into Linux. That would be great. Michael -- wolfgang: problem is, if I do _not_ follow up with another key press, I actually want history

Re: [patch] GNU Mach-1.x support for 3c556 NIC

On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:06:28PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > What about: > > 2004-02-15 Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Adds support for 3c556 from Linux-2.2.17-pre14, originally by > Fred Maciel. > > * linux/src/drivers/net/3c59

Re: [patch] GNU Mach-1.x support for 3c556 NIC

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:06:12PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >Index: linux/src/drivers/net/3c59x.c >=== >RCS file: /cvsroot/hurd/gnumach/linux/src/drivers/net/Attic/3c59x.c,v >retrieving revision 1.3 >diff -u -

Re: gnumach 1.3 + gcc 3.3

On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 02:11:29PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > [Please keep the CC intact, I re-added bug-hurd to the CC list.] > >I checked out the gnumach-1-branch but there are still problems with >the latest version of autoconf 2.59 :( > > Please report the exact problem that yo

Re: [linux 2.6 patch] ext2 support for hurd extensions via xattr interface

On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:19:42PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > Hi folks. I've just whipped up the following patch, which is against the > current Linux 2.6 source tree. This provides a means to fetch and store > the extra data stored in nodes on ext2 filesystems with "creator_os" set to > EXT2

Re: [Linux 2.6 PATCH] support for Hurd ext2 format extensions

On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:46:36PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > This is a cleaned-up and polished version of the Linux 2.6 patch to > support Hurd ext2 format extensions via the xattr interfaces. To faciliate testing (by Debian users at least), I've created (or let's say, hacked together) both

Re: [linux 2.6 patch] ext2 support for hurd extensions via xattr interface

On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 07:55:25PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Just curious, would it not make sense to have this for ext3, too? After > > all, one can mount ext3 filesystems as ext2 on GNU/Hurd (AFAIK), > > As I understand it, it is true that an ext3 filesystem with its journal > files full

Re: [linux 2.6 patch] ext2 support for hurd extensions via xattr interface

On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 04:50:58PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > Firstly, you are using the second patch I posted, not the first, right? Yes. > > > > 1.) Quite often (seemingly random) a bogus gnu.author gets displayed by > > getfattr: > > > > blackbird/mnt$ getfattr -Rh -d -m '.*' gnu/servers

Re: [Linux 2.6 PATCH] support for Hurd ext2 format extensions

On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:46:36PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > I am not going to submit this to Linus et al until I've gotten > positive reports that people are actually using it in practice and > successfully. I've did some more testing of your patch yesterday. For that, I bootstrapped a new D

Bug#226609: Processed: Re: Bug#226609: crosshurd: Problem with much memory

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:48:20PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > reassign 226609 gnumach > Bug#226609: crosshurd: Problem with much memory > Bug reassigned from package `crosshurd' to `gnumach'. > > > thanks > Stopping processing here.

Bug#184624: reboots unexpectedly after panic

On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:10:25PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > I was running an highly resource consumption process when Mach > paniced. The reason is probably related to bug #82600 > > But the problem i'm reporting is that Mach unexpectedly rebooted the > machine after panicing. The error messa

Re: GNU Mach network driver update.

On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:52:32PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Have fun, and please beat the crap out of all the drivers you can. > Specially ones that are common. I've tried out your patch for my 3c556 (which there is currently no support for in GNU Mach 1.x, but I've posted a patch some day

Re: [Linux 2.6 PATCH] support for Hurd ext2 format extensions

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:17:14PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > Index: fs/ext2/Makefile > > > > Why did you drop the Kconfig data? > > It's in fs/Kconfig and I forgot that there was any of the patch that was > outside the fs/ext2, so I omitted it in my diff command. > > > I had to add this

Re: [Linux 2.6 PATCH] support for Hurd ext2 format extensions

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:32:39PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > Here is a new version of the patch. Please let me know how it works for you. (I've uploaded new versions of the kernel-patch and the kernel-image packages to 'deb http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/xattr-hurd/ ./') This time, after

Re: GNU Mach network driver update.

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 12:17:23PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:52:32PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > Have fun, and please beat the crap out of all the drivers you can. > > Specially ones that are common. > I've tried out your patch for m

Re: [Linux 2.6 PATCH] support for Hurd ext2 format extensions

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:03:23AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > If you'd like to see any further testing, please tell me what I could > do. In the meantime, I installed Debian GNU/Hurd with a patched Linux/star a couple of times and have not experienced any problems. On the other

Re: [Linux 2.6 PATCH] support for Hurd ext2 format extensions

rical result out of range. Cannot setxattr for 'bin/true'. If I (addtionally to one of those two device files above) tar up one of /dev/tty[a-z]*, I get instead: star: Operation not supported. Cannot setxattr for 'bin/true'. I did not have the time to run star throug

Re: [Linux 2.6 PATCH] support for Hurd ext2 format extensions

d) @ 0 (0) --- open("/etc/passwd", O_RDONLY) = 4 fcntl64(4, F_GETFD) = 0 fcntl64(4, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 Tracing the extraction of slightly different files yielded the SIGCHLD at a slightly different position: @@ -165,7 +165,8 @@ read(4, &

Re: [Fwd: ext2fs patch for large stores, RC1+20040304]

d/resolved? > And don't forget that if you test the patch, you'll probably want > patched e2fsprogs too. You can get the patch from > http://debian.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/~ogi/hurd/ext3fs/ . It applies cleanly > to e2fsprogs_1.35-2 (with some offsets, but without *.rej files). D

Re: [BUG][LIBC] getcwd gives up too easily

On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 10:02:52PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >You'll still have to put up with the Makefile suckiness, though. > > And that our I/O system sucks. So it won't help much using ccache or > distcc. Nobody in his right mind compiles glibc natively on GNU anyway :p Michael,

Re: Hang on ext2fs.static

On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 02:38:06PM -0700, Barry deFreese wrote: > I just recompiled Hurd with gcc-3.3 with Ogi's patches and now the > machine hangs with ext2fs.static... :-( Uhm, so here's a bit of advice until the demi-gods jump in: I /seem/ to remember that people said that you might get prob

Re: Filesystem synchronization problem

On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 04:33:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am having a problem with my ext2 filesystem. Sometimes at shutdown it > seems not to be unmounted correctly. After printing all the shutdown > messages, the system hangs then for some seconds. At the next startup, fsck > tells w

Re: Filesystem synchronization problem

On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 02:53:46PM +0200, "Sören Schulze" wrote: > I think Debian strips the binaries, but it sometimes provides packages > with unstripped binaries seperatedly. I agree that it would make sense to have an unstripped hurd-dbg eventually. Michael -- "The goal of Debian is to hav

Re: GNU Mach network driver update.

On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 03:51:28PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Nobody was interested in it, so I didn't bother keeping a backup of > it. Well, I submitted a patch to make it work with my NIC. I still did not get around testing whether that problem exists on Linux, too, though. It looked like

Bug#253662: hurd: Typo in postinst breaks new installs

Package: hurd Version: 20040508 Severity: serious Tags: patch There's a typo in the postinst of the hurd package, making the installation fail: --- hurd.postinst.orig 2004-06-10 18:16:09.0 +0200 +++ hurd.postinst 2004-06-10 18:16:18.0 +0200 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ --install

Re: X and other visions

On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 01:51:07PM +0200, "Sören Schulze" wrote: > GNU/Linux: [...] > Example: > Every Desktop Environment has its own handling of virtual file systems > (which will become redundant in the Hurd) and URL openings (would be > done by something like httpfs in the Hurd). > Though

Re: X and other visions

On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 12:05:50PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Note that Desktop Environments such as GNOME are not Linux specific. > > GNOME runs (and is well supported by Sun) on Solaris, for example. Of > >

Re: libps/libihash

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:04:02PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > As the code is inherently non-portable, it would be simple and > feasible to add -std=gnu99 to the Makefiles of dpkg for this single > file only, or only if the target architecture is the Hurd. That's what Ogi did, but it still go

Re: Re: Booting Debian GNU/Hurd

On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 01:21:22PM +0400, ??? ?. ? wrote: > >>Size of file system is >2 Gb (~4 Gb). > > > >This is too big. Better use a smaller filesystem. A 4GB filesystem > >only works with a patched Hurd build, which is not easy to set up when > >you are new to GNU/Hurd, I think.

Re: please re-activate notifications on commit

Hi, On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:42:01PM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote: > I've just noticed that automatic notifications of commits can be enabled > again[1] :-) Please someone with permissions to do so. > > [1] http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=3197 AFAIK, Jeff was working on this/ha

Re: X-Window

On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 01:50:05PM +0700, arief# wrote: > Maybe this is repeating, but I need to make sure. Please do not unnecessarily cross-post, most people read all three (debian-hurd, bug-hurd, help-hurd) lists. > I try to run X, so I do apt-get install x-window-system-core rxvt and > fvwm j

Error with Ogi's ext2fs patch

Hello, I was compiling glibc over night two days ago, and when I woke up, I had a frozen box and one screenful of error messages. If I remember correctly, I formatted the (3.x GB) partition under GNU/Linux with -o hurd, mounted it under GNU/Linux and performed the Debian-specific commands to extr

Re: the watchdog of login program

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 07:51:53AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Even without debugging it's obvious that main process doesn't get owner > (looking with ps, etc). I tried to investigate why, but I didn't succeed. > As I said, this happens only when login is run as non-root or from > inetutils

Bug#268347: hurd: /dev/tty devices get created without checks

Package: hurd Version: 20040508-2 Severity: normal When one reinstalls the hurd package (for whatever reason), one sees some ugly error messages while it is being setup, something like: /dev/vcs: Device or Resource busy /dev/tty1: Device or Resource busy /dev/tty2: Device or Resource busy /dev/tt

Re: hurd_20040508-3.changes ACCEPTED

(CCing debian-hurd, as this is mostly Debian related) On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 01:22:56PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote: > Is this what I have been waiting for, a fixed hurd? Well, this upload fixed the /libexec/rc and /bin/login permission problems, and is built against a current glibc finall

Bug#272655: hurd package needs to drop /sbin/fsck (was: Re: hurd 20040508-3 with the ext2fs patch)

Package: hurd Severity: serious On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 11:29:09AM +0200, Simon Kagstrom wrote: > It seems like this caused a dselect-upgrade to fail for me after i > updated today, see the log below. My sources.list contain > > deb http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian unreleased main > deb http://ftp.de.

Build oskit-mach, immediate page fault

Hello, I tried to build and run oskit-mach today. Building (see below) went fine, but when I try to boot it, I get the following (transcribed): Welcome to GNU Mach 1.91! Kernel page fault at address 0x1, eip = 0x1 Kernel Page fault trap, eip 0x1 kernel trap, type 14, code = 0 Dump of trap_state a

Re: rc.local, again

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:06:58PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > +echo running local commands... > +if [ -r /libexec/rc.local ]; then > + source /libexec/rc.local > +fi > + wouldn't be nicer to only echo that message if there actually is an rc.local file around? Michael ___

[patch] some Hurd console keyboard shortcut/layout changes

is already the case in the Mach console. enjoy, Michael 2004-11-14 Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * pc-kbd.c (input_loop): Make the left shift and page-up/down key combinations scroll the console up or down by half a screenful. --- pc-kbd.c.orig 2004-11-14

Re: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY error

On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 09:43:59PM +0530, Suman wrote: > Here is the partition listing of my disk from linux. > > /dev/hdc3 1014 1275 2104515 83 Linux > > Hurd is not able to fix this problem automatically. > > I've got 2GB hurd partition. /dev/hdc3 in the above listing is the

Re: [Linux 2.6 PATCH] support for Hurd ext2 format extensions

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:32:39PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > Here is a new version of the patch. Please let me know how it works for you. I had another look at this, for possibly submitting it to the Debian kernel team. I noticed one thing: > Index: fs/ext2/xattr.c > ===

Re: Problem with console.

On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 01:04:22AM +0100, Adrien Montoille wrote: > When I run 'console -d vga -d pc_kbd /dev/vcs' it works perfectly but > if i try to add mouse support with '-d pc_mouse' my screen becomes > black and i can't do anything more. FWIW, I have the same problem. It helped when I switc

Re: pthread headers

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 09:52:56PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Why didn't you declare macro's for `extern __inline__' and use the > already provided ones like __PT_SPIN_INLINE in > sysdeps/generic/bits/pthread.h? Robert Millan sent in a patch which does exactly this some time ago (see http://

[patch] Install correct libpthread.a and libpthread_pic.a

2005-01-21 Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Makefile ($(libdir)/libpthread2.a): Install linker script from $(srcdir) instead of current directory. ($(libdir)/libpthread2_pic.a): Likewise. Index: Ma

Re: hurd installation

s a Linux kernel (as also the messages you quote indicate), so this won't work on a Hurd partition I guess. cheers, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html ___ Bug-hurd

Re: putty package, getresgid undefined..

write that. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: Updated patch for weak aliases for glibc

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 06:27:53PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >Try again: > > You failed. > > Fix your mail client to do proper text handling; like not stripping of > whitespaces at the beginning of a line. Resending it, I rediffed it against CVS HEAD. cheers, Michael 2005-02-10 Ba

<    1   2   3   >