>
> I think if you need ACPI in gnumach to provide SMP support for the
> kernel, then ACPI tables reading functionality should be in gnumach then?
I agree. In this case, access to ACPI tables through a translator could
produce a recursive dependency problem (Translator could need gnumach, and
gnu
Almudena Garcia, le lun. 12 nov. 2018 19:12:16 +0100, a ecrit:
> I think if you need ACPI in gnumach to provide SMP support for the
> kernel, then ACPI tables reading functionality should be in gnumach then?
>
> I agree. In this case, access to ACPI tables through a translator could
> pro
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 12 nov. 2018 19:29:57 +0100, a ecrit:
> Almudena Garcia, le lun. 12 nov. 2018 19:12:16 +0100, a ecrit:
> > I think if you need ACPI in gnumach to provide SMP support for the
> > kernel, then ACPI tables reading functionality should be in gnumach
> > then?
> >
> >
>
> I mean, the kernel can have its own ACPI implementation, just enough to
> get the information needed for SMP.
Ok. What I need is to read RSDT table, to get the pointer to APIC table,
which store the information about processors and ioapic
In my docs, I've written the procedure to get this:
