Almudena Garcia, le lun. 12 nov. 2018 19:12:16 +0100, a ecrit: > I think if you need ACPI in gnumach to provide SMP support for the > kernel, then ACPI tables reading functionality should be in gnumach then? > > I agree. In this case, access to ACPI tables through a translator could > produce > a recursive dependency problem (Translator could need gnumach, and gnumach > needs translator to enable the processors during the boot)
But we don't need all ACPI to get what SMP needs. ACPI is a nightmare, if we can avoid most of it in the kernel, that's for all the best. Samuel
