Re: Minor bug introduced by commit b04364b

2016-05-09 Thread Justus Winter
Quoting Esa Peuha (2016-05-06 18:39:11) > Most changes in commit b04364b seem to be fine, but this one isn't: > > @@ -405,7 +401,7 @@ run (const char *server, mach_port_t *ports, task_t *task) > } > >if (verbose) > -fprintf (stderr, "started %s\n", prog); > +fprintf (stderr, stde

Re: ext2fs crash

2016-05-09 Thread Justus Winter
Hi :) Quoting Thomas Schwinge (2016-04-27 22:53:33) > Before preparing the next set of releases, I wanted to sort-of > sanity-check what we currently got (at least in terms of Debian > packages), so yesterday dist-upgraded my Debian GNU/Hurd system to the > latest packages, and started a GCC boots

Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks

2016-05-09 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Agustina Arzille writes: > The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public > License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either > - version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later ver

Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks

2016-05-09 Thread Agustina Arzille
On 05/08/2016 07:42 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: 512M is not so much, perhaps use more as Richard suggested. I did try that, and got farther than before (Thanks, Richard!). On the other hand, glibc's testsuite failed during math/tgmath2, after a crash. The output was: (17916) crashed, signal: {

Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks

2016-05-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Agustina Arzille, on Mon 09 May 2016 22:45:17 -0300, wrote: > On 05/08/2016 07:42 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >512M is not so much, perhaps use more as Richard suggested. > > I did try that, and got farther than before (Thanks, Richard!). On the other > hand, glibc's testsuite failed duri