Hi!
I'm porting some software to Debian GNU/Hurd and I think the issues I
found are bugs in the Hurd. I haven't reported bugs about the Hurd
before, and I'm unsure whether this is an issue with the kernel or libc
or some translator, but I'm hoping someone here will know what code to
patch.
As di
As reported as 2) in this mail:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-08/msg00027.html
it seems the nanosleep function modifies the second parameter on
success.
This behaviour doesn't seem consistent with the specification at
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/function
As explained as 4) in this e-mail:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-08/msg00027.html
it seems like the ttyname_r function returns EINVAL when the provided
buffer is too small.
This doesn't seem consistent with the specifcation at:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/969991979
Simon Josefsson, le Thu 04 Aug 2011 12:10:43 +0200, a écrit :
> it seems the nanosleep function modifies the second parameter on
> success.
>
> This behaviour doesn't seem consistent with the specification at
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/nanosleep.html
>
> It see
From: Simon Josefsson
> As explained as 4) in this e-mail:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-08/msg00027.html
>
> it seems like the ttyname_r function returns EINVAL when the provided
> buffer is too small.
>
> This doesn't seem consistent with the specifcation at:
>
> htt
Simon Josefsson, le Thu 04 Aug 2011 12:07:56 +0200, a écrit :
> Maybe just a s/EISDIR/EEXIST/ at the appropriate place?
IIRC it was looked after at length on bug-hurd last year or two years
ago, there was just no conclusion or patch to fix them all.
Samuel
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Simon Josefsson, le Thu 04 Aug 2011 12:07:56 +0200, a écrit :
>> Maybe just a s/EISDIR/EEXIST/ at the appropriate place?
>
> IIRC it was looked after at length on bug-hurd last year or two years
> ago, there was just no conclusion or patch t
