As reported as 2) in this mail: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-08/msg00027.html
it seems the nanosleep function modifies the second parameter on success. This behaviour doesn't seem consistent with the specification at http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/nanosleep.html It seems the second parameter should not be modified unless the call fails with EINTR, right? /Simon
