Hi,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 11:00:03PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:59:15PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > If so, unionmount could be used with a bootstrap filesystem in the
> > > case of
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:13:38PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 04:53:29AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 10:39:51PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:27:10AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > > > On
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:58:42AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:48:05PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> But iopl is a all-or-nothing-like thing (all I/O ports),
I see...
I guess though that fixing that would still be easier than writing a
proper ioper
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:42:41AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> /* We can only report back a single error value; the first one
> wins. */
> if (! err)
> err = err_l;
"Last one wins" would be easier to implement -- and I think it's more
common
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:11:41PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> * eth-multiplexer/device_impl.c (ds_device_open): Check if
> openstat flags are a subset of mode flags (not conversely).
> * eth-multiplexer/vdev.c (add_vdev): Copy name only if it
> is not NULL.
Why are you putting these two c
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 07:12:22PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> There are two ways to use it: either the GNU Mach RPCs
> i386_io_perm_create and i386_io_perm_modify (see
> [gnumach]/i386/include/mach/i386/mach_i386.defs) can directly be used,
> or the more standard (at least on x86) glibc
Hi,
> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 20:15:42 -0400
> From: steve paesani
> I would like to (suggest) form(ing) a co-operative that makes use of
> what I call a 'dev comp' software licence that has for intent to
> compensate the production/development costs of the software, that is,
> sustain to a reason
