Hi, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 11:00:03PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:59:15PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > If so, unionmount could be used with a bootstrap filesystem in the > > > case of LiveCDs, for instance. > > > > Exactly. > > Hm, then it probably makes sense to look at implementing the bootstrap > fsys_* RPCs in the future. IIRC, LiveCDs are big requestors of > unioning functionality, so being able to work in this context would be > a nice feature. Well, as I said, I'm not sure it's even possible to use it like that... And I don't want to think about it right now :-) Not saying we need to implement them any time soon. My point was only that these RPCs *might* make sense for unionmount after all -- you were a bit too quick with discarding this possibility :-) > > > Unfourtunately, as it has already been discussed on the IRC, I > > > failed to overload netfs_S_fsys_* stubs by simple redifinition of > > > the corresponding functions. > > > > I must admit that I don't remember what the problem was there... > > The problem is as follows. Usually, when you want to overload the > default implementation of a stub (like netfs_S_file_set_translator), > you just redefine this function in your code (which I successfully did > for netfs_S_file_set_translator in nsmux, IIRC). However, when I try > to do the same with netfs_S_fsys_* RPCs, my new functions are not > called, so I fail to do the simple overloading. That's strange indeed... -antrik-
