Re: Unionmount: proxying the control port

Hi, On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 08:17:10PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 02:40:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > Well, I don't know exactly why, but I do know that NFS needs some > > stable representation of nodes. I remember how in a talk about some > > Linux f

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add the code for adding the mountee to the merged filesystems

Hi, On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:22:51PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:20:35AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:53:50PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > ulfs_check is used to update the list of ports to the underlying > > > filesyste

Re: News...

Hi, On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:30:59PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 05:17:27AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 07:10:15PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > I really don't like the idea of postponing the news till the next > > month. T

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add the mountee to the list of merged filesystems.

Hello, On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:02:50PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:22:51PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:20:35AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > > wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:53:50PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] Enable the mountee to be started after initialization.

>From 190cae3ebd013ac5e168fae9b9f50456e3d4679a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergiu Ivanov Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:49:14 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Enable the mountee to be started after initialization. * main.c (main): Schedule an update to start the mountee. * mount.c (setup_unionmount): Don't fo

How to request notifications

Hello, My current goal is to make unionmount go away when the mountee (the union-mounted translator) goes away. From antrik's words (and from personal remembering) I know that this could be achieved by listening to the MACH_NOTIFY_NO_SENDERS notification on translator's control port. However, I

Re: NX support in GNU Mach

Yuhong Bao, le Mon 13 Jul 2009 11:46:09 -0700, a écrit : > > Other things I have found in my experience with Debian GNU/Hurd is that > aptitude and man-db is still broken. > I am using apt-get for now, but it doesn't have the TUI that aptitude have. Feel free to help on these. Samuel

Re: Unionmount: proxying the control port

Hello, On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:24:32PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 08:17:10PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 02:40:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > > wrote: > > > > > Is this really a problem? The question is whether nfsd can dea

Re: News...

Am Montag, 13. Juli 2009 12:07:46 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > > and the patches are not yet in the upstream sources. > > Nor are they likely to be next month, or the one after... > > The news will look very sad if we go by upstream inclusion. Since upstream-inclusion might take an undefined

RE: NX support in GNU Mach

Other things I have found in my experience with Debian GNU/Hurd is that aptitude and man-db is still broken. I am using apt-get for now, but it doesn't have the TUI that aptitude have. > Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:36:59 -0400 > From: samuel.thiba...@gnu.or