Sorry, forgot to forward to the list...
But while I'm at it: To me "pathological" doesn't mean bad, but simply "a very
seldomly appearing case", as out maths profs use it - I just realized that
the expression could be easily taken wrong.
And: Many thanks for the info about changes in Linux! T
Hi,
Which version of gcc you using?
Regards,
- AG
- Original Message
From: zhengda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 5 June, 2008 4:46:12 AM
Subject: glibc in Hurd
Hi,
I have some troubles with glibc.
First, I'm not sure I get the right source code of glibc for
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 02:01:12AM +0100, Flávio Cruz wrote:
> You are right, it may create redundancy but, wouldn't it be nice to
> define new interfaces without leaving lisp and then using them to
> create new servers only with lisp code? I'm not even talking about
> re-defining the already
Hi Madhusudan,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 02:48:51PM +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote:
>I have done few commits to be code today. I request you to please
>check the code.
Well, not being familiar with libnetfs, I unfortunately can't really
tell whether the code makes sense.
I didn't discover an
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 07:50:14PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:10 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "-u" is more tricky that "-gunzip", as it doesn't skip one specific
> > translator, but rather filters a whole class. While it is certainly
> > possible to implement
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 01:16:12AM +0200, zhengda wrote:
> I want to try the modified glibc. I compile it again, but I don't want
> to install it in my system directly. I write a very simple test
> program which only calls socket(). I want to compile the test program
> with the modified glibc
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 09:10:01PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag 03 Juni 2008 05:16:47 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Not knowing Mercurial, I can't really judge. But I have a very hard
> > time believing that any other system comes even *close* to the power
> > and flexib
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:55:21PM +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > git, like UNIX, is based on a couple of very simple yet powerful
> > ideas, and a set of basic tools doing the work. On top of that, you
> > get a set of high-level scripts to easily perfo
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:38:53AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> I'm interested in how they are going to tackle that in the Summer of
> Code project.
>
> I didn't find information about the way they want to do it in the
> short description (and I don't have the time to investigate r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 04:17:37PM +0200, Zheng Da wrote:
step 1. A mechanism for different pfinet servers to communicate with each
other:
There are two possible solutions to reach the goal at least: the BPF
translator and the hypervisor.
For the approach of the
Hello,
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:13 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that the virtual nodes are always created on demand, the moment
> they are accessed; so you would never actually create both variants up
> front. But conceptually, you indeed could think of two virtual nodes
> used alternati
Am Samstag 07 Juni 2008 17:54:46 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > ... And, in my opinion, that contributes to the ``usefulness''
> > of knowing Git. Isn't the intent for Hurd is to be based on
> > ``very simple yet powerful ideas''? And to provide layered
> > (rather than monolithic
Am Samstag 07 Juni 2008 18:19:29 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Err... Does that mean that Mercurial doesn't even offer rebase (and it
> can't be implemented trivially)?!
That means, that the Mercurial people say, that history should be preserved in
most cases, so it wasn't first priority.
It can
13 matches
Mail list logo
