And here is my second attempt. I think I've fixed all minor problems
everyone had with my last patch (Thanks Alfred, Marcus and
Wolfgang).
I would also like some comments about this patch. Please tell me what
to change, add, do before sending it to the tar mailinglist.
What I also like to know is
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 03:36:56PM +0200, M. Gerards wrote:
> I think all my questions are answered right now, with the exception of
> file_get_translator and file_set_translator. Those two functions are
> undocumented and I'd like to know if I used them the right way.
They are documented in fs.d
Quoting Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> > To add translators to a tar file you have to use the "-a" switch. It
> > doesn't add symlinks, devices and fifos. I guess that is the behaviour
> > we want.
>
> In effect, yes. I am not quite sure on tar's internal logic, but it
> appeared
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:22:34PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> I wrote a patch for GNU tar to support passive translators.
Wow. This is definitely going in the right direction.
> To add translators to a tar file you have to use the "-a" switch. It
> doesn't add symlinks, devices and fifos. I g
Quoting "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>I really appreciate any feedback, even about the changelog (My english
>sucks and I guess I made some mistakes). :)
>
> Here you go.
And thanks!
>2003-06-19 Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * configure.ac: Check for
I really appreciate any feedback, even about the changelog (My english
sucks and I guess I made some mistakes). :)
Here you go.
2003-06-19 Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* configure.ac: Check for hurd.h.
* src/common.h (dump_translator_option): New variable.
Was that patch to coreutils already commited?
Nope. But I will try to get it applied this summer.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:22:34PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> My biggest problem is autoconf. It doesn't even work perfectly for the
> orginal sourcecode. I've added a test to check for the Hurd by looking
> for hurd.h, is that correct?
Check for individual features; for example, when the featu
Quoting "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>I have a question about the output while verbosely listing the
>tarball content. Now I use a format like: ">> /hurd/ext2fs
>/dev/hd0s2" just like the output for symlinks, but ">>" instead of
>"->". Is this the output we want? Alfred,
I have a question about the output while verbosely listing the
tarball content. Now I use a format like: ">> /hurd/ext2fs
/dev/hd0s2" just like the output for symlinks, but ">>" instead of
"->". Is this the output we want? Alfred, what did you use for ls?
I used => for translators in t
Hi,
I wrote a patch for GNU tar to support passive translators. Can
someone please check it (especially the Hurd part) before I send it to
the tar mailinglist?
My biggest problem is autoconf. It doesn't even work perfectly for the
orginal sourcecode. I've added a test to check for the Hurd by loo
11 matches
Mail list logo
