Re: uname -m

2002-05-26 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 03:17:20PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > > I think that maybe the definition of reasonable might just as well be: > > whatever config.guess can deal with. > > We can get config.guess changed without difficulty. So I think that we > should choose what best fits the presum

Re: uname -m

2002-05-26 Thread Roland McGrath
> I think that maybe the definition of reasonable might just as well be: > whatever config.guess can deal with. We can get config.guess changed without difficulty. So I think that we should choose what best fits the presumptions of any packages that use uname -m and do NOT use config.guess. ___

Re: uname -m

2002-05-25 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:26:15PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Change it if you feel it should be, but consider some Makefiles out there > are currently reliying on uname -m for their filenaming conventions > (see any Jorg Schilling program for example, now being ported) Of course they should,

Re: uname -m

2002-05-24 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 08:12:39PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > The utsname.machine string is chosen in proc/host.c:initialize_version_info. > Mach's host_basic_info gives you integers for "CPU type" and "CPU subtype", > with constants defined in . Our file proc/cpu-types.c > gives string names

Re: uname -m

2002-05-20 Thread Roland McGrath
The utsname.machine string is chosen in proc/host.c:initialize_version_info. Mach's host_basic_info gives you integers for "CPU type" and "CPU subtype", with constants defined in . Our file proc/cpu-types.c gives string names to these, and we use "type-subtype" as the utsname.machine string. The