Hi,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:16:04AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 22. September 2009 00:44:55 schrieb
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > The only major advantage of Mercurial over Git seems to be that it's
> > easier to grasp initially (at least for people coming from CVS/SVN)
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:26:54PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 16:54:54 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
>
> > I have a course of German at the University now, so I'll soon become a
> > true Hurd man :-) (since, apparently, a lot of Hurd people speak
> > Germ
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 16:54:54 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > It sort of automatically creates shorter aliases for you - saves
> > keystrokes.
>
> Aha, so it does so automatically. I somehow thought you have to
> define aliases by yourself.
You can, but you don't have to.
> > And when y
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 04:01:36PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 14:45:41 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > Well, yes, but wasn't CVS, for instance, created for distributed code
> > collaboration, too? Or do I understand the word ``distributed''
> > wrong?
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 14:45:41 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> Well, yes, but wasn't CVS, for instance, created for distributed code
> collaboration, too? Or do I understand the word ``distributed''
> wrong?
The difference is that in CVS you have a reference server, so it's normally
called "c
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 02:09:32PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 13:23:43 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > Hm, I thought there would be more differences than that. Although
> > from your discussion with Arne last summer I could only suppose that
> > git an
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 13:33:08 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > Also you can very easily customize it with extensions... damn, we had
> > that discussion already. It took several weeks of pages-long E-Mails :-)
>
> Oh, I really didn't mean to make both you and antrik repeat what you
> have onc
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 13:23:43 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> Hm, I thought there would be more differences than that. Although
> from your discussion with Arne last summer I could only suppose that
> git and Mercurial are very similar in many approaches.
They were written for the same usecas
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:16:04AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 22. September 2009 00:44:55 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:08:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > Seeing how advertently you propagate Mercurial in every applicable
> >
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:44:55AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:08:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > Seeing how advertently you propagate Mercurial in every applicable
> > task, I think I'll have to have a look at it :-) It should be worth
> > the
Am Dienstag, 22. September 2009 00:44:55 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:08:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > Seeing how advertently you propagate Mercurial in every applicable
> > task, I think I'll have to have a look at it :-) It should be worth
> > the time ;-)
11 matches
Mail list logo
