Hello, On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:44:55AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:08:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > Seeing how advertently you propagate Mercurial in every applicable > > task, I think I'll have to have a look at it :-) It should be worth > > the time ;-) > > Only if you actually get involved in a project using it. > > Learning another VCS just for the sake of it is surely not worth the > time. The only major advantage of Mercurial over Git seems to be that > it's easier to grasp initially (at least for people coming from CVS/SVN) > -- and as you already know Git fairly well, there is nothing to win > there for you...
Hm, I thought there would be more differences than that. Although from your discussion with Arne last summer I could only suppose that git and Mercurial are very similar in many approaches. In this case I'll postpone learning Mercurial to some indefinite time. Regards, scolobb