Barry deFreese, le Tue 08 Jul 2008 12:28:57 -0400, a écrit :
> By "working Debian system" do you mean Debian GNU/Linux or a Debian Hurd
> system?
A GNU/Linux system, since gnumach does not support running as dom0.
Samuel
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 08 Jul 2008 09:41:20 +0200, a écrit :
Not sure what the best approach is. Ideally, they should run in two
distinct VMs sharing the hardware :-)
Yes. That's also what I'd suggest. There'd as well be the plus of other
people being able to
Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 08 Jul 2008 09:41:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > Not sure what the best approach is. Ideally, they should run in two
> > distinct VMs sharing the hardware :-)
>
> Yes. That's also what I'd suggest. There'd as well be the plus of other
> people being able to reboot/recover hung s
Hello!
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 12:57:27PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:52:07 +0200, a écrit :
> > Maybe I am wrong, but updates on wiki content should trigger little
> > bursts of activity, not sustained periods of 100% cpu load.
>
> The wiki engine regenerates
Hello!
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:16:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:56:17PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > I'm still a little concerned about the HD but I'm not sure how much
> > trouble it would be to get it up on a new one. I'm up for
> > suggestions, etc.
On 7/5/08, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:52:07 +0200, a écrit :
>
> > On 7/5/08, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:21:29 +0200, a écrit :
> > >
> > > > On 7/5/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:52:07 +0200, a écrit :
> On 7/5/08, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:21:29 +0200, a écrit :
> >
> > > On 7/5/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > > On the other hand, the wiki
On 7/5/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks,
> On the other hand, the wiki seems to need a fast machine, so using it
> for the wiki exclusively would be a waste...
> Not sure what the best approach is. Ideally, they should run in two
> distinct VMs sharing the hardware :-)
Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:21:29 +0200, a écrit :
> On 7/5/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> > On the other hand, the wiki seems to need a fast machine, so using it
> > for the wiki exclusively would be a waste...
> > Not sure what the best approach is. Idea
On 7/5/08, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:21:29 +0200, a écrit :
>
> > On 7/5/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > > On the other hand, the wiki seems to need a fast machine, so using it
> > > for the wiki exclus
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:56:17PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> I'm still a little concerned about the HD but I'm not sure how much
> trouble it would be to get it up on a new one. I'm up for
> suggestions, etc.
Shouldn't be a problem I think... Just copy the whole disk :-)
> I also ha
Hi folks,
OK, I have finally put a new machine in for shitbox. It's still not
super high-end (700Mhz PIII with 384Mb) but it should at least be more
stable and come back up when rebooting.
I also did a dist-upgrade. I hope that wasn't a bad thing. I'm still a
little concerned about the HD
12 matches
Mail list logo
