Re: Libc patch no longer applies

Hi Thomas, Thomas Schwinge skribis: > This 00-glibc-hurd.patch seems to be bogus. How exactly do you create > it? >From : # Do a raw diff against this `baseline' commit. git diff ea42a20caed5b343ff20a0d4622ae6c17b7716

Re: Libc patch no longer applies

Hi! IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-10-12 tschwinge: the patch generated from Savannah's libc doesn't apply to Sourceware's: http://hydra.nixos.org/build/1452335 : [...] applying patch `/...-glibc-hurd-patches/00-glibc-hurd.patch'... pa

Re: Libc patch no longer applies

Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 11 Oct 2011 11:41:59 +0200, a écrit : > > More than that: libthreads used to set up the thread-specific area, and > > some places are hardcoded. We need to check that this still works. > > Hmm, what exactly do you mean? After some patching/hacking, I have now > forwarded t

Re: Libc patch no longer applies

Hi! On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:49:28 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Ludovic Courtès, le Tue 13 Sep 2011 10:46:01 +0200, a écrit : > > The libc patch from Savannah’s repo no longer applies to upstream libc [0]. > > This is a consequence of the removal of lack-of-TLS support: > > > > > > http://s

Re: Libc patch no longer applies

Hi! On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:23:20 +0200, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) wrote: > Thomas Schwinge skribis: > > > ... and this did work! That is, ``--build=i486-gnu --host=i486-gnu'' > > configuration with GCC 4.4, plus old binutils downgraded to Debian > > package 2.20.1-2. >

Re: Libc patch no longer applies

Hi Thomas! Thomas Schwinge skribis: > ... and this did work! That is, ``--build=i486-gnu --host=i486-gnu'' > configuration with GCC 4.4, plus old binutils downgraded to Debian > package 2.20.1-2. > > And, on the other machine (with the 2010-04 trees), I built with recent > binutils as a crossch

Re: Libc patch no longer applies

Hi! On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:49:31 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > ... and this did work! That is, ``--build=i486-gnu --host=i486-gnu'' > configuration with GCC 4.4, plus old binutils downgraded to Debian > package 2.20.1-2. > > And, on the other machine (with the 2010-04 trees), I built with re

Re: Libc patch no longer applies

Hi! IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-09-15: Hooray! I found my glibc source and build (!) directories from 2010-04. String dump of section '.comment': [ 1] GCC: (Debian 4.4.3-3) 4.4.3 Aha. Good. And binutils 2.20.1.20100303. I'm inclined to say that it is a

Re: Libc patch no longer applies

Thomas Schwinge skribis: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:46:01 +0200, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) wrote: >> Should we rebase Savannah’s libc on top of the current upstream libc and >> then update the topic branches accordingly? > > Yes, and I'm AT THE MOMENT :-) working towards

Re: Libc patch no longer applies

Hi! On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:46:01 +0200, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) wrote: > Should we rebase Savannah’s libc on top of the current upstream libc and > then update the topic branches accordingly? Yes, and I'm AT THE MOMENT :-) working towards this. This time for real. Real

Re: Libc patch no longer applies

Ludovic Courtès, le Tue 13 Sep 2011 10:46:01 +0200, a écrit : > The libc patch from Savannah’s repo no longer applies to upstream libc [0]. > This is a consequence of the removal of lack-of-TLS support: > > > http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=d063d164335938d557460bebaa7cfe38

Libc patch no longer applies

Hi, The libc patch from Savannah’s repo no longer applies to upstream libc [0]. This is a consequence of the removal of lack-of-TLS support: http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=d063d164335938d557460bebaa7cfe388157b627;hp=3ce1f2959437e952b9db4eaeed2407424f11a4d1 Should we reb