Re: Working on stuff / statement from tschwinge (was: Gnumach clean: Need advice, re Header files)

2006-11-09 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 14:06 -0300, Leonardo Pereira wrote: > "I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the > death, your right to say it." - Voltaire "Moron, I told you wahat todo you fuck nutt." "PLEASE GET A FUCKING CLUE YOU FUCKING IDIOT!" "Then suck the cock of a cow."

Re: Working on stuff / statement from tschwinge (was: Gnumach clean: Need advice, re Header files)

2006-11-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
> As for the technical issue, Roland is mostly but not entirely right > about what gnumach/include is for. > > It has both the interface files, and pseudo-clones of C library headers, > which don't get installed because the C library has better versions. In > that category are , , , > , , , > ,

Re: Working on stuff / statement from tschwinge (was: Gnumach clean: Need advice, re Header files)

2006-11-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
I think Roland's email was a little over-hasty, to be sure. Let's just not fret about one message that was over-hasty and import too much to it, ok? As for the technical issue, Roland is mostly but not entirely right about what gnumach/include is for. It has both the interface files, and pseudo-

Re: Working on stuff / statement from tschwinge (was: Gnumach clean: Need advice, re Header files)

2006-11-09 Thread Leonardo Pereira
TECTED]> (message from Thomas Schwinge on Thu, 9 Nov 2006 13:50:31 +0100) Subject: Re: Working on stuff / statement from tschwinge (was: Gnumach clean: Need advice, re Header files) Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FCC: ~/RMAIL.outbox References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAI

Working on stuff / statement from tschwinge (was: Gnumach clean: Need advice, re Header files)

2006-11-09 Thread Thomas Schwinge
[Cced to hurd-devel.] Hello! On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:46:36PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > I haven't looked at the changes myself. If any files have been added to > include/, it sounds like there is some inadequate review going on before > commits. Folks, don't go hog-wild when you don't r

Re: Gnumach clean: Need advice, re Header files

2006-11-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Roland McGrath, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 20:07:32 -0800, a écrit : > include/ is for installed headers. None of those should be added. There has been alloca.h there from Thomas since 1997. Samuel ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.

Re: Gnumach clean: Need advice, re Header files

2006-11-08 Thread Roland McGrath
> OK, thanks for the reply. Then should my printf.h move under kern/ where > printf.c is? I haven't looked at the changes myself. If any files have been added to include/, it sounds like there is some inadequate review going on before commits. Folks, don't go hog-wild when you don't really k

Re: Gnumach clean: Need advice, re Header files

2006-11-08 Thread Barry deFreese
- Original Message - From: "Roland McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Barry deFreese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 11:07 PM Subject: Re: Gnumach clean: Need advice, re Header files include/ is for installed headers

Re: Gnumach clean: Need advice, re Header files

2006-11-08 Thread Roland McGrath
include/ is for installed headers. None of those should be added. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Gnumach clean: Need advice, re Header files

2006-11-08 Thread Barry deFreese
Hi again, Looking at more of the implicit declarations of functions (and there are a ton). The question now is, where to declare them and/or put the header files. printf.h was a little bit of a special case because it didn't exist. But, take, for example, panic(). It is instantiated in debu