Re: ENOTSOCK

2017-03-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
David Michael, on lun. 13 mars 2017 16:31:08 -0700, wrote: > could it also be backported to the tschwinge/Roger_Whittaker branch? Sure! done so. Samuel

Re: ENOTSOCK

2017-03-13 Thread David Michael
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > David Michael, on dim. 12 mars 2017 19:43:40 -0700, wrote: >> A few of the socket-related functions in glibc don't seem to return >> ENOTSOCK. Would it be more "correct" to return th

Re: ENOTSOCK

2017-03-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, David Michael, on dim. 12 mars 2017 19:43:40 -0700, wrote: > A few of the socket-related functions in glibc don't seem to return > ENOTSOCK. Would it be more "correct" to return this as opposed to > EMIG_BAD_ID? In particular, can at least send() be made

ENOTSOCK

2017-03-12 Thread David Michael
Hi, A few of the socket-related functions in glibc don't seem to return ENOTSOCK. Would it be more "correct" to return this as opposed to EMIG_BAD_ID? In particular, can at least send() be made to return ENOTSOCK for PulseAudio compatibility? The following example uses both