On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> wrote: > Hello, > > David Michael, on dim. 12 mars 2017 19:43:40 -0700, wrote: >> A few of the socket-related functions in glibc don't seem to return >> ENOTSOCK. Would it be more "correct" to return this as opposed to >> EMIG_BAD_ID? In particular, can at least send() be made to return >> ENOTSOCK for PulseAudio compatibility? The following example uses >> both MIG_BAD_ID and EOPNOTSUPP as some other functions do, although >> I've only seen it return EMIG_BAD_ID. > > Oh indeed, thanks for the suggestion, now commited upstream and in > Debian.
Thanks for taking care of that, but could it also be backported to the tschwinge/Roger_Whittaker branch? I'm still using that as my glibc source for Hurd, and I imagine it will be a while before it catches up to where upstream is now. Thanks. David
