Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Making PyHurd build again under cython 0.14.1.

2011-05-08 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:40:39PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > At Fri, 8 Apr 2011 21:05:55 +0200, wrote: > > > It is quite rough (copied a file from cython, needs to be included > > > cleanly). > > > > What would "included cleanly" mean? And why is it necessary? > > The file is a

Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Making PyHurd build again under cython 0.14.1.

2011-04-11 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi, At Fri, 8 Apr 2011 21:05:55 +0200, wrote: > > This patch makes pyhurd build again under cython 0.14.1. > You should rather Cc: it to Anatoly, who will (hopefully) be your > mentor... I will. I CCed it to you, because we discussed in IRC and because I value your input. Besides: Yes, I can

Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Making PyHurd build again under cython 0.14.1.

2011-04-08 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 04:21:25AM +0200, arne_...@web.de wrote: > This patch makes pyhurd build again under cython 0.14.1. OK. I'm not sure why you Cc:ed it to me though... I don't even speak Python :-) You should rather Cc: it to Anatoly, who will (hopefully) be your mentor... > It is qu

[PATCH 0 of 3] Making PyHurd build again under cython 0.14.1.

2011-04-07 Thread arne_bab
This patch makes pyhurd build again under cython 0.14.1. It is quite rough (copied a file from cython, needs to be included cleanly). This included file is licensed under Apache 2.0, so PyHurd has to be switched to GPLv3 to avoid a license conflict (I adjusted the copyright header). I verified