Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

2005-09-28 Thread Bob Proulx
Hi Marcus > thanks for setting this up and clearing the queues. You deliver the > tins, we bring you the spam! ;) It always seems like everyone has so much spam they are always willing to share. :-) > Okie. I added a moderator. Who or what is the mail manager you added > in the moderator ema

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

2005-09-28 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi Bob, thanks for setting this up and clearing the queues. You deliver the tins, we bring you the spam! ;) At Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:04:01 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > Messages from non-subscribers who have never posted to the list before > will be held for human review. Those g

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

2005-09-25 Thread Bob Proulx
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Bob, could you setup the needed magic for the following lists: > > bug-hurd@gnu.org > help-hurd@gnu.org > web-hurd@gnu.org All done. I finished the configuration changes for the last two just a little bit ago. What this means to the mailing list: Messages from subscri

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

2005-09-25 Thread Bob Proulx
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Bob, could you setup the needed magic for the following lists: Sure. I would be happy to set that up for you. > bug-hurd@gnu.org > help-hurd@gnu.org > web-hurd@gnu.org Oh my, there is a lot of spam in the hold queues there. I am actually on a short trip at the moment t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

2005-09-25 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
Great! Thanks a lot Bob. I might note that Thomas (Scwhinge) voluenteered in helping with filtering mail that needed human attention. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

2005-09-24 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
Bob, could you setup the needed magic for the following lists: bug-hurd@gnu.org help-hurd@gnu.org web-hurd@gnu.org Do you need any permisions changed so you can set this all up? l4-hurd@gnu.org would also be nice to add, but I'd like to raise it with people on that list first before anything is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

2005-09-24 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:00:46PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > What do people think about the following to reduce spam on bug-hurd > and help-hurd? Yes, that's definitively a sound approach that is working very well for other lists. Shouldn't commit-hurd, l4-hurd and web-hurd also be filtered

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

2005-09-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What do people think about the following to reduce spam on bug-hurd > and help-hurd? It won't clean up the old archives, but it will clean > up future archives and might shut some people up that have been > voicing their opinion about spam to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

2005-09-16 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
At Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:00:46 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > What do people think about the following to reduce spam on bug-hurd > and help-hurd? It won't clean up the old archives, but it will clean > up future archives and might shut some people up that have been > voicing their opinion abou

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

2005-09-16 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
What do people think about the following to reduce spam on bug-hurd and help-hurd? It won't clean up the old archives, but it will clean up future archives and might shut some people up that have been voicing their opinion about spam to bug-hurd/help-hurd. --- Start of forwarded message -