Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: compiling hurd/mig ?]

Hi, --- On Jan 10, 2008 3:58 PM, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | From: "marian klein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Can anyone send the instructions or develop a script of how can I | compile MiG/hurd? \-- Use this Makefile to build the toolchain: http://www.bddebian.c

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: compiling hurd/mig ?]

cd hurd-old cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/hurd co . cd mig running the next compile-mig script: #cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/hurd co . #cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/hurd co -r gnumach-1-branch . cp ../gnumach/install-sh build-aux cp ../gnumach/config.guess

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux check_native.c]

Hello! This needs to be ported (or probably rather rewritten) for GNU/Hurd. | CVSROOT: /cvs/glibc | Module name: libc | Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-14 06:57:27 | | Added files: | sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux: check_native.c | | Log message: | Check for native

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Help with entropy?]

Hello! On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:43:51PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: > Thanks for going through it. Sure. :-) > On Jun 20, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >From: Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >| Index: i386/i386at/conf.c > > >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Help with entropy?]

can publish that stuff somewhere. From: Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> My problem is when the buffer is completely drained (like when I use GPG to generate a key), it fails to refill. Has this problem been resolved now? As a test case I wouldn't use `gpg', but a si

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Help with entropy?]

urd mailing lists, emails about gathering entropy in the kernel and translators for `/dev/{,u}random', as well as source code for some translators. I think I can publish that stuff somewhere. From: Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > My problem is when the buffer > is complet

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Help with entropy?]

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:37:02 +0200 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I don't get this part: > > > /* Setup the offset pointer to add data */ > > offset = entropy_write_offset + 1; > > if (offset + sizeof(unsigned long) == ENTROPYBUFSIZE) { > &

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Help with entropy?]

se it. Michael On Jun 20, 2007, at 9:37 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I don't get this part: /* Setup the offset pointer to add data */ offset = entropy_write_offset + 1; if (offset + sizeof(unsigned long) == ENTROPYBUFSIZE) { offset = 0;

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Help with entropy?]

fsets (which might be the problem) Michael On Jun 20, 2007, at 9:37 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I don't get this part: /* Setup the offset pointer to add data */ offset = entropy_write_offset + 1; if (offset + sizeof(unsigned long) == ENTROPYBUFSIZE) { offset = 0; }

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Help with entropy?]

Hi, I don't get this part: > /* Setup the offset pointer to add data */ > offset = entropy_write_offset + 1; > if (offset + sizeof(unsigned long) == ENTROPYBUFSIZE) { >offset = 0; > } Why the +1 ? You sure that's really what you want?... -antrik- __

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Help with entropy?]

Hello! As I'll -- at the earliest -- be able to have a look at your entropy work (or any other Hurd related issues, for that matter) in roughly thirty hours, I'm forwarding your email to bug-hurd, as requested. People may indeed tear your patch to tatters, but if they do, then only to help you, s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: gnumach ChangeLog config.status.dep.patch [gnumach-1-branch]]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:50:55PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > 12:22:41 up 6 days, 6:00, 20 users, load average: 145.63, 71.19, 28.72 > Does somebody want to try that on a GNU/Hurd system? ;-) I "tried" that when I built the Debian gcc-4.1 package from experimental it had something like "

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: gnumach ChangeLog config.status.dep.patch [gnumach-1-branch]]

geLog config.status.dep.patch Log message: 2007-04-11 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * config.status.dep.patch: Update to match more files. This fixes building GNU Mach with ``make -j2'' and higher. The problem was

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: hurd/sutils ChangeLog swapon.c]

Modified files: sutils : ChangeLog swapon.c Log message: 2007-04-07 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * swapon.c (main, doc) [!SWAPOFF]: Unless overridden, consider a swap signature when deciding whether to add a paging dev

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: GSoC proposal, device driver glue code]

Hi, On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:49:40PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: > how hard would it be to generalize the "glue layer" and let us load > drivers as modules instead? Not sure what you mean. Generalize in what regard? -antrik- ___ Bug-hurd mailing

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: GSoC proposal, device driver glue code]

Richard Braun wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 05:58:57PM -0300, Matheus Morais wrote: I had learning a bit about Linux 2.6 device drivers and I share of the same opinion from syn. I could see a _lot_ of work to update the glue code. My question is, update to Linux 2.6 device drivers is more fe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: GSoC proposal, device driver glue code]

at first, thank you all for you kind comments and for the time you spent reading my proposal. I will try to be as precise as possible. Something missing in this proposal is how to deal with runtime changes, especially for USB devices. that's true. there are a lot of things missing mostly

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: GSoC proposal, device driver glue code]

On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 05:58:57PM -0300, Matheus Morais wrote: > I had learning a bit about Linux 2.6 device drivers and I share of the same > opinion from syn. I could see a _lot_ of work to update the glue code. My > question is, update to Linux 2.6 device drivers is more feasible than write > a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: GSoC proposal, device driver glue code]

On 3/23/07, Richard Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I like this proposal but I also have a question : did you consider BSD drivers ? I understand you have experience with Linux drivers, and this is a very good reason to work on a glue code for them, but from what I could see (at least th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: GSoC proposal, device driver glue code]

On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 12:49:28AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hello Okuji and Richard! > > May I ask you to have a look at the attached email and especially the url > referenced in there, ? > This application makes a rather profound impression t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: GSoC proposal, device driver glue code]

On Friday 23 March 2007 00:49, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hello Okuji and Richard! > > May I ask you to have a look at the attached email and especially the url > referenced in there, ? > This application makes a rather profound impression to me. > > Fe

Re: libpthread linking problem -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: imagemagick: convert hangs on hurd-i386]

At Sat, 27 Jan 2007 00:21:15 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > And why do we need all three of `__NAME', `_NAME' and `NAME'? > > __NAME is usually used for letting libpthread be sure to call its own > functions, while NAME can be overriden by other libraries. I don't know > for _NAME. NAME is a s

Re: libpthread linking problem -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: imagemagick: convert hangs on hurd-i386]

Hi, Thomas Schwinge, le Fri 26 Jan 2007 14:13:48 +0100, a écrit : > > Ok, the problem is that convert is linked both with libpthread and > > libX11, and when looking for the pthread_mutex_unlock() symbol, the one > > from libX11 (void stub) is found instead of the one from libpthread. > > 19:

Re: libpthread linking problem -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: imagemagick: convert hangs on hurd-i386]

Hello! > Ok, the problem is that convert is linked both with libpthread and > libX11, and when looking for the pthread_mutex_unlock() symbol, the one > from libX11 (void stub) is found instead of the one from libpthread. Before applying Samuel's patch: #v+ 36: 62f041 FUNCGLOBAL

Re: libpthread linking problem -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: imagemagick: convert hangs on hurd-i386]

Neal H. Walfield, le Sat 20 Jan 2007 13:23:59 +0100, a écrit : > This looks reasonable. Feel free to apply. Ok, applied. Michael, maybe you'll want to grab a new snapshot just for this fix ;) Samuel ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://l

Re: libpthread linking problem -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: imagemagick: convert hangs on hurd-i386]

This looks reasonable. Feel free to apply. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

libpthread linking problem -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: imagemagick: convert hangs on hurd-i386]

Hello! Neal, can you comment? The original report of the problem (I think) was this one here: . Regards, Thomas --- Begin Message --- reassign 407208 hurd thanks Hi, Samuel Thibault, le Tue 16 Jan 2007 22:16:01 +0100, a écrit : > convert

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: gnumach i386/linux/configure i386/linux/configu... [gnumach-1-branch]]

ach Branch: gnumach-1-branch Changes by: Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/01/23 22:28:47 Modified files: i386/linux : configure configure.ac . : ChangeLog Log message: 2006-01-23 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: src/gas/testsuite ChangeLog gas/i386/divide.d ...]

Applied. * configure.tgt (i386-*-gnu*): Set em=gnu. * config/te-gnu.h: New file. * config/tc-i386.c: Don't use '/' as comment char for TE_GNU. Thank you. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: src/gas/testsuite ChangeLog gas/i386/divide.d ...]

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:40:29PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >> > On i586-pc-gnu, '/' anywhere on the line starts a comment. >> > This is because the original x86 sysv assembler used '/' to >> > start comments. In mid 1998, I changed this for the linux >> > version of x86 gas,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: src/gas/testsuite ChangeLog gas/i386/divide.d ...]

> > On i586-pc-gnu, '/' anywhere on the line starts a comment. > > This is because the original x86 sysv assembler used '/' to > > start comments. In mid 1998, I changed this for the linux > > version of x86 gas, so that '/' could be used in expressions as > > a divide operator. Ot

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: src/gas/testsuite ChangeLog gas/i386/divide.d ...]

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:55:51AM -0500, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:10:35AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > > On i586-pc-gnu, '/' anywhere on the line starts a comment. This is > > because the original x86 sysv assembler used '/' to start comments. > > In mid 1998, I changed t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: src/gas/testsuite ChangeLog gas/i386/divide.d ...]

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:10:35AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > On i586-pc-gnu, '/' anywhere on the line starts a comment. This is > because the original x86 sysv assembler used '/' to start comments. > In mid 1998, I changed this for the linux version of x86 gas, so that > '/' could be used in expr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: src/gas/testsuite ChangeLog gas/i386/divide.d ...]

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:30:55PM -0500, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Could someone please comment on the following difference, which still > persists: > > #v+ > $ cat > foo.s > .text > start: > push 3/2 > #v- > > Natively, i686-pc-linux-gnu: > #v+ > $ gas/as-new foo.s > $ objdump -d a.out > [...] >

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: src/gas/testsuite ChangeLog gas/i386/divide.d ...]

[ CCed to bug-hurd for your information. ] Hi! That one: #v+ CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-07 06:03:50 Modified files: gas/testsuite : ChangeLog gas/testsuite/gas/i386: divide.d divide.s i386.exp intelok.d Log

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: gnumach and gcc 4.0 (patch 1)]

s Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: bug-hurd@gnu.org Subject: Re: gnumach and gcc 4.0 (patch 1) On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 07:35:34PM -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > --- linux/src/drivers/net/ne2k-pci.c > +++ linux/src/drivers/net/ne2k-pci.c > @@ -542,7 +542,10 @@ > if (coun

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: [PATCH] Fix for gnumach's LDT code]

Ping? --- Start of forwarded message --- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:27:46 +0200 From: Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: bug-hurd@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] Fix for gnumach's LDT code A few weeks ago I was working on getting TLS working on the Hurd. Unfortunately, I don'

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Hi Marcus > thanks for setting this up and clearing the queues. You deliver the > tins, we bring you the spam! ;) It always seems like everyone has so much spam they are always willing to share. :-) > Okie. I added a moderator. Who or what is the mail manager you added > in the moderator ema

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Hi Bob, thanks for setting this up and clearing the queues. You deliver the tins, we bring you the spam! ;) At Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:04:01 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > Messages from non-subscribers who have never posted to the list before > will be held for human review.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Bob, could you setup the needed magic for the following lists: > > bug-hurd@gnu.org > help-hurd@gnu.org > web-hurd@gnu.org All done. I finished the configuration changes for the last two just a little bit ago. What this means to the mailing list: Messages from subscri

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Bob, could you setup the needed magic for the following lists: Sure. I would be happy to set that up for you. > bug-hurd@gnu.org > help-hurd@gnu.org > web-hurd@gnu.org Oh my, there is a lot of spam in the hold queues there. I am actually on a short trip at the moment t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Great! Thanks a lot Bob. I might note that Thomas (Scwhinge) voluenteered in helping with filtering mail that needed human attention. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Bob, could you setup the needed magic for the following lists: bug-hurd@gnu.org help-hurd@gnu.org web-hurd@gnu.org Do you need any permisions changed so you can set this all up? l4-hurd@gnu.org would also be nice to add, but I'd like to raise it with people on that list first before anything is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

ed to be reviewed manually. Below, I re-quoted the proposal, if someone wants to re-view it again. Regards, Thomas > --- Start of forwarded message --- > Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:45:21 -0600 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) > Subject: R

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Hi, "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What do people think about the following to reduce spam on bug-hurd > and help-hurd? It won't clean up the old archives, but it will clean > up future archives and might shut some people up that have been >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

At Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:00:46 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > What do people think about the following to reduce spam on bug-hurd > and help-hurd? It won't clean up the old archives, but it will clean > up future archives and might shut some people up that have been > voicing their opinion abou

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

ssage --- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:45:21 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) Subject: Re: spam Simon Josefsson wrote: > Hi all. How do people handle spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses? I am helping with a number of the bug lists. A small number of us including

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [PATCH] Trivial fix on an argument in ftpfs]

Commited to ams-branch. ftpfs/ChangeLog 2005-07-30 Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * node.c (ftpfs_create_node): Check the result from hurd_ihash_add (). Add E to the hash table instead of NEW. libihash/ChangeLog 2005-07-30 Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL

[EMAIL PROTECTED](B

$B!!!z8=:_!"%5%$%H#O#P#E#N%-%c%s%Z!<%sCf!z(B $BHV9fG'>Z$G(B10.000$B1_J,$NL5NA%]%$%s%H$,$b$i$($^$9!#(B($BEPO?L5NA(B) $BI,$:[EMAIL PROTECTED]($k$H$$$&<+?.$,$"$k$+$i$G$9!#(B $BG<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&$G$7$?$iB`2q$7$F$b$i$C$F$+$^$$$^$;$s!#(B $B%o%s%/%j%

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [PATCH] Trivial fix on an argument in ftpfs]

Ping... --- Start of forwarded message --- From: "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: bug-hurd@gnu.org Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:33:07 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Trivial fix on an argument in ftpfs Looks ok, I haven't tested it, but Samuel told me that he had.

$B?7HVAH!J%K%e!<%U%'%$%9B3!9EPO?Cf!K(B?$B([EMAIL PROTECTED](B$B(B $B(B?

$B%"%/%;%9!&EPO?L5NA!&L5NA%]%$%s%HIU"M(B http://awg.webchu.com/sweet-s/?1 $B0lEYGA$$$F(B...$B4E$$Nx$r$7$F$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B!j2q0wB3!9EPO?Cf!I?7A/$G$9!#(B http://awg.webchu.com/sweet-s/?1 18$B:PL$K~$O$4MxMQIT2D(B $B"#(B$B"#(B $BIT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your Application Confirmation Mon, 06 Jun 2005 01:47:22 -0800

Hello, We sent you an email a while ago, because you now qualify for a much lower rate based on the biggest rate drop in years. You can now get $327,000 for as little as $617 a month! Bad credit? Doesn't matter, ^low rates are fixed no matter what! Follow this link to process your application an

$B:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>MM$K(B

$B'$'$'$!!Bg?M$I$&$7$N=P2q$$$r3Z$7$_$^$;$s$+!)!!'$'$'$(B [EMAIL PROTECTED];o$K9-9p$r:\$;[EMAIL PROTECTED],<+K}$G$9!#(B [EMAIL PROTECTED](B,$BM7$SAj<[EMAIL PROTECTED](B,$B$$$1$J$$NxAj<[EMAIL PROTECTED](B [EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B!!4|4VCf$K?75,EPO

$B:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>MM$K(B

$B'$'$'$!!Bg?M$I$&$7$N=P2q$$$r3Z$7$_$^$;$s$+!)!!'$'$'$(B [EMAIL PROTECTED];o$K9-9p$r:\$;[EMAIL PROTECTED],<+K}$G$9!#(B [EMAIL PROTECTED](B,$BM7$SAj<[EMAIL PROTECTED](B,$B$$$1$J$$NxAj<[EMAIL PROTECTED](B [EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B!!4|4VCf$K?75,EPO

$B:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>MM$K(B

$B'$'$'$!!Bg?M$I$&$7$N=P2q$$$r3Z$7$_$^$;$s$+!)!!'$'$'$(B [EMAIL PROTECTED];o$K9-9p$r:\$;[EMAIL PROTECTED],<+K}$G$9!#(B [EMAIL PROTECTED](B,$BM7$SAj<[EMAIL PROTECTED](B,$B$$$1$J$$NxAj<[EMAIL PROTECTED](B [EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B!!4|4VCf$K?75,EPO

$B:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>MM$K(B

om/?num=100 $B!!$5$i$K!*(B $B!!4|4VCf$K?75,EPO?$5$l$F(BTEL$BEPO?$5$l$^$9$HA40w$K(B $B!!#1K|[EMAIL PROTECTED],$N%]%$%s%H$r%W%l%<%s%H!*!*(B $B!!$o$:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<%I%"%?%C%/$,=PMh$^$9!#(B $B!!(Bhttp://live.livedear.com/?num=100 [EMAIL PROTECTED];o$K9-9p$r:\$;[EMA

$B:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>MM$K(B

om/?num=100 $B!!$5$i$K!*(B $B!!4|4VCf$K?75,EPO?$5$l$F(BTEL$BEPO?$5$l$^$9$HA40w$K(B $B!!#1K|[EMAIL PROTECTED],$N%]%$%s%H$r%W%l%<%s%H!*!*(B $B!!$o$:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<%I%"%?%C%/$,=PMh$^$9!#(B $B!!(Bhttp://live.livedear.com/?num=100 [EMAIL PROTECTED];o$K9-9p$r:\$;[EMA

$B:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>MM$K(B

om/?num=100 $B!!$5$i$K!*(B $B!!4|4VCf$K?75,EPO?$5$l$F(BTEL$BEPO?$5$l$^$9$HA40w$K(B $B!!#1K|[EMAIL PROTECTED],$N%]%$%s%H$r%W%l%<%s%H!*!*(B $B!!$o$:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<%I%"%?%C%/$,=PMh$^$9!#(B $B!!(Bhttp://live.livedear.com/?num=100 [EMAIL PROTECTED];o$K9-9p$r:\$;[EMA

[EMAIL PROTECTED](BDevotion$B!j(B

$B'T!!'T(B $B'$'T'$'T'$'T'$'T'$'T'$'T'$'T'$'T'$'T'$'T'$(B $B!!!y!!4JC1!uL5NAEPO?!!C/$G$bA`:[EMAIL PROTECT

Material de limpeza para empresas [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], bug-hurd@gnu.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Title: Email Limpezanet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]"_javascript_" CODEPAGE="1252"%> Agora você já pode comprar direto pela INTERNET PRODUTOS DE LIMPEZA PROMOÇÃOAniversário de 1

Application approval for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:19:50 -0800

Hello, We sent you an email a while ago, because you now qualify for a much lower rate based on the biggest rate drop in years. You can now get $327,000 for as little as $617 a month! Bad credit? Doesn't matter, ^low rates are fixed no matter what! Follow this link to process your application a

We resolve to propose you absolutely fresh model of Vacheron Constantin wrist watches. Excellent offer for [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit my web site, i have great prices and numerousness of trade marks for sale, for example Blancpain, Breguet and Vacheron Constantin. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Virus Found in message "Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])"

Symantec AntiVirus found a virus in an attachment you (bug-hurd@gnu.org ) sent to Carsten Gomard. To ensure the recipient(s) are able to use the files you sent, perform a virus scan on your computer, clean any infected files, then resend this attachment. Attachment: message.scr Virus name: W3

Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?

Andrew Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I thought this list was supposed to be readonly anyway... :( Yes, but unfortunately it is not, same for the commit lists. -- Marco ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.or

[EMAIL PROTECTED] `‚±‚ñ‚È‚±‚Ƃ܂Ł`Ÿ

(B[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@090-8502-8857 (BŽóM‚ð‹‘”Û‚·‚éê‡‚Í‚»‚ÌŽ|[EMAIL PROTECTED] (BŽóM‚ð‹‘”Û‚·‚éê‡‚Í‚»‚ÌŽ|[EMAIL PROTECTED] (BŠÈ’P‰ðœƒy[ƒWhttp://www.psend.com/users/9800optout/opt-out.html‚Ü‚Å (B[EMAIL

[EMAIL PROTECTED] w ‘W•Ò xw —m•¨ x-VOL.4-Ÿ

(B[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@090-8502-8857 (BŽóM‚ð‹‘”Û‚·‚éê‡‚Í‚»‚ÌŽ|[EMAIL PROTECTED] (BŽóM‚ð‹‘”Û‚·‚éê‡‚Í‚»‚ÌŽ|[EMAIL PROTECTED] (BŠÈ’P‰ðœƒy[ƒWhttp://www.psend.com/users/9800unsub/unsub.html‚Ü‚Å (B[EMAIL

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(B[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED] (BŽóM‚ð‹‘”Û‚·‚éê‡‚́A‚»‚ÌŽ|[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] 090-9192-7321 (B[EMAIL PROTECTED] (BŽóM‚ð‹‘”Û‚·‚éê‡‚́A‚»‚ÌŽ|[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B (B (B--- (B (B[EMAIL PROTECTED

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ŒƒˆÀ‚c‚u‚c”Ì”„ŠJŽnI

(B[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B‚±‚̃[ƒ‹ƒAƒhƒŒƒX‚Í‘—Mê—p‚Å‚·‚Ì‚Å (B¡Œã”zM‚ðŠó–]‚µ‚È‚¢•ûiƒIƒvƒgƒAƒEƒgj‚Í‚±‚¿‚ç‚Å‚¨Šè‚¢‚µ‚Ü‚·B (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@http://www.delivery-mail.com/opt-out/tmmail.cgi (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]|ƒŒ[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@“Œ‹ž“s

confirm unsubscribe from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. I'm working for my owner, who can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] To confirm that you would like [EMAIL PROTECTED] removed from the ohw-list mailing list, please send an empty reply to this address: