On 3 August 2010 05:14, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote:
>
>> | Finishing the HURD would not advance us at all in supporting these
>> | devices. The work that is needed is at the driver and firmware level.
>> | That's why our high priority task list includes items relating to
>> | free drivers, but no
2009/11/17 Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Am Dienstag, 17. November 2009 14:32:29 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> Similarly, if you want to put a single warning sign somewhere in
>> yellow on red then you just add it. If you want your site to have some
>> particular text color you b
2009/11/17 Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Am Montag, 16. November 2009 23:07:33 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> It's not all or none. You can use different text style and size,
>> alignment, spacing, borders, ... and colors.
>>
>> But whenever you touch an aspect of the s
2009/11/16 Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Am Montag, 16. November 2009 11:34:22 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> > If you set the background, you also have to set all other colors, else
>> > the custom user color for a visited link could be invisible.
>>
>> Yes, that's
2009/11/15 Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Am Sonntag, 15. November 2009 19:44:57 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> They can offer alternate dark and bright themes.
>
> But that requires setting all colors again.
>
> It makes it impossible for people to get into webdesign bit by bit - ei
2009/11/15 Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Am Sonntag, 15. November 2009 16:27:13 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> Yes, you either set all colors or set none, anything else is broken
>> (as is your web site).
>
> That's a quite extreme view - and mine differs.
It's not
2009/11/15 Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Am Sonntag, 15. November 2009 14:55:09 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> You cannot make a site which has no background, has text color set,
>> and expect it to be readable. The default background color may be any
>> color, including the one
2009/11/15 Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Am Sonntag, 15. November 2009 01:42:19 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
>> (Not everyone likes reading text on a white background! It regularily
>> makes my eyes hurt. I wonder what morons created the myth that it would
>> be more ergonomic :-( )
>
> I currently
2009/11/10 :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:47:26AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, 5. November 2009 13:56:09 schrieb
>> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
>
>> > My opinion is that there is no "one size fits all" here.
>>
>> My opinion is that there's quite a neat sweet spot bet
Hello
This discussion is quite interesting.
I would say that the major problem with git is it does not come with
enough documentation.
If you want to use mercurial you just type hg help, and what you get
is comprehensive enough to allow you to clone a repo, add your
changes, and publish your pat
2009/2/20 :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 23/01/2009, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
>> wrote:
>
>> > Design and feasible use cases are *not* orthogonal in practice.
>>
>> They are certainly not. I
Hello,
Sorry about the late reply.
On 23/01/2009, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 01:44:59PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > 2009/1/13 :
>
> > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 06:22:27PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
>
> >
2009/1/13 :
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 06:22:27PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> 2009/1/3 :
>
>> >> Yes, the system provides a service out of the box that provides DRM
>> >> memory which might be a step towards DRM content protection. I do
>
Hello
2009/1/3 :
[...]
>> Yes, the system provides a service out of the box that provides DRM
>> memory which might be a step towards DRM content protection. I do not
>> like the feature but I have not seen a secure system design without
>> such feature, either.
>
> Well, as I explained, we belie
On 31/12/2008, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:10:39PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > On 27/12/2008, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
>
> > > The user session is obviously not the parent of all processes
On 30/12/2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag 30 Dezember 2008 17:23:58 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>
> > Yes, and then the application does not get the right keys to decrypt
> > the data from the device. So the ability to lie (or be root) is
> > irrelevan
On 30/12/2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag 30 Dezember 2008 16:55:33 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>
> > You can make the driver return any data you want. However, if the data
> > it returns are checksums signed by the cryptography hardware vendor
> > ke
On 30/12/2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag 30 Dezember 2008 14:04:52 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>
> > You need a special hardware to verify the integrity of the system, and
> > I can imagine that in a modular system the hardware driver might work
> > with
On 30/12/2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag 30 Dezember 2008 14:10:28 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>
> > Yes, it might. It might generally create encrypted blobs usable only
> > in non-free environment.
> >
> > The choices taken during the design
On 30/12/2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag 30 Dezember 2008 13:21:21 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>
> > On 30/12/2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag 30 Dezember 2008 11:51:05 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
> > > > And how is the compute
On 30/12/2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag 30 Dezember 2008 12:10:39 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>
> > The underlying interface the two binaries use is different. However,
> > they both show a window on my screen and access the same Documents
> > folder for
On 30/12/2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag 30 Dezember 2008 12:43:45 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>
> > Yes, it does. But with DRM content protection it is not the system
> > what makes the computer useless but the services or devices outside of
> > the compu
On 30/12/2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag 30 Dezember 2008 11:51:05 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>
> > And how is the computer ever going to not allow sending the photo?
>
>
> For example because the camera is a test version where you have to pay to
> unlock t
On 29/12/2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Montag 29 Dezember 2008 17:23:45 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>
> > > Accessing some service which limits the system in a way which is
> > > incompatible with the GPLv3 (as soon as central usage gets "interfered
>
On 27/12/2008, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:19:26PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > 2008/12/22 :
>
>
> > > Well, *we* don't find EROS-like persistence useful for our purpose.
> > > I never found it useful
On 29/12/2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Montag 29 Dezember 2008 17:23:45 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>
> > In my view trying to deny users the choice to enter contracts like the
> > one P requires is not the right way. It is morally dubious and
> > technically in
On 29/12/2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag 23 Dezember 2008 12:19:26 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>
> > Normally you can choose how effective the 'drm protection' is - in (d)
> > you can defeat it by using the root handle. However, security
> >
2008/12/22 :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 04:03:39PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> 2008/12/18 :
>
>> I find persistence and storage mechanism that works well with it quite
>> useful.
>
> Well, *we* don't find EROS-like persistence useful for our p
2008/12/18 Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Am Donnerstag 18 Dezember 2008 16:03:39 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> > Only if you assume that "security that is actually usable" implies
>> > hiding things from the parent process. As I already explained, we
>> > bel
2008/12/18 :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:09:19PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> 2008/12/12 :
>
>> I see that the EROS or Coyotos as a whole does not fit the
>> requirements of a GNU system but I think reusing some basic parts is
>> no worse than usi
2008/12/12 :
> Hi,
>
> It's a bit strange to answer here, as part of the discussion seems to
> have gone on off-list. Yet there are a few things in your mail that even
> lacking context I feel compelled to set straight...
>
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:19:34PM +0
2008/12/8 Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Freitag 05 Dezember 2008 12:40:32 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
[...]
>> For me firefox can cause my media player to skip. This is because
>> firefox eats all available CPU time from time to time, and the only
>
2008/12/8 Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Freitag 05 Dezember 2008 12:31:52 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> 2008/12/3 Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > Am Sonntag 30 November 2008 21:08:43 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> >> The de
2008/11/25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 04:20:01PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
>> Well, you don't stop using knives because people can be threatened and
>> killed with them, do you?
>
> Please, don't start that discuss
2008/11/23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:24:42PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> 2008/11/20 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:17:29PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
[...]
>> In my view saying "this is
2008/11/21 Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 23:24:42 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> As I see it the problem with Coyotos is more political than technical.
>> Technically it might be possible to just not use additional feature
>>
2008/11/18 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:11:32AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> 2008/10/29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> > Perhaps the biggest difference is that on Linux, even with FUSE,
>> > users are limited to a fixed
2008/11/20 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:17:29PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> > I am not familiar with the Hurd internals either. However, as I
> > understand the current design it uses the UNIX security model with
> >
2008/11/14 Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Donnerstag 13 November 2008 23:45:59 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> No, it certainly would not. You do not have
>>
>> - the correct and proven lisp bindings for the Hurd API
>
> You have the list bindings wh
2008/11/13 Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Am Donnerstag 13 November 2008 23:17:29 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
> > The security model used by EROS and Coyotos uses capabilities instead.
>
> As far as I understand Neals research paper, he's also thinking
2008/11/13 Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Donnerstag 13 November 2008 21:13:52 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> This would require rewriting most of the Hurd in Lisp to allow
>> carrying around modifications to even more basic services.
>
> Would
2008/11/13 Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Donnerstag 13 November 2008 21:13:52 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> Still what profile would you assign to Firefox? It does all of the
>> above so it can read all your files, make enough copies of them to
>> fill y
2008/11/13 Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Donnerstag 13 November 2008 10:11:32 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
>> How is this easier than carrying around an eeepc/olpc?
>
> I can use the processing power of the system at hand instead of having to rely
> on my
Hello
It looks like this other thread has some of the bits I wrote about in
greater detail .. and it also has some other interesting bits.
2008/10/29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> A more serious difference is the ability to mount image files directly
> -- on Linux, you need loop devices for that, wh
Hello
Since the brainstorming non-critique period is over I would like to
point out where the Hurd failed to fulfill some expectations for me.
The first and most important part is reliability.
While I can understand that on a system used by next to nobody not
everything works well there was a s
On 19/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, that's what I meant actually: the diskfs_sync_everything() function
> is able to trigger a lot of thread creations.
>
> A way to have things work correctly would be by marking threads with a
> "level", i.e. diskfs_sync_everythin
On 19/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michal Suchanek, le Wed 19 Mar 2008 12:22:48 +0100, a écrit :
>
> > On 19/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Michal Suchanek, le Wed 19 Mar 2008 10:53:13 +0100, a écrit :
>
On 19/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michal Suchanek, le Wed 19 Mar 2008 10:53:13 +0100, a écrit :
>
> > On 18/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Michal Suchanek, le Tue 18 Mar 2008 17:01:21 +0100, a écrit :
>
On 18/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michal Suchanek, le Tue 18 Mar 2008 17:01:21 +0100, a écrit :
>
> > > > Plus keep all versions of packages on some "hurd-core" list until
> > > > somebody manually marks a newer version
On 18/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michal Suchanek, le Tue 18 Mar 2008 13:15:27 +0100, a écrit :
>
> > > Debian doesn't wait for non-official architectures to catch up.
> >
> > They do delete Hurd packages when there are no new on
On 18/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michal Suchanek, le Mon 17 Mar 2008 16:34:42 +0100, a écrit :
>
> > On 17/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Arne Babenhauserheide, le Mon 17 Mar 2008 12:26:30 +0100, a
On 17/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arne Babenhauserheide, le Mon 17 Mar 2008 12:26:30 +0100, a écrit :
>
> > > As for automatically building live CDs and/or qemu images, this would be
> > > very useful -- maybe that part is indeed an appropriate task for GSoC.
> > > But a
On 10/24/05, Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So could you recommend us someone for help.
>
> You will have to ask something a bit more specific.
>
> But a good start as to learning what needs to be done to port a
> file-system is examining the existing code, and figuring out how to
53 matches
Mail list logo
