possible for it to run in emulated 32bit
mode on amd64)?
Thanx
Brcha
--
Filip Brcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWWeb: http://purl.org/NET/brcha/home/
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 40994923
Yahoo! brcha
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpBIXlAvBldd
y about his disapproval of GPLv3). His way of reasoning and talking
with people can best be described with a saying: "I have already made my
mind. Don't confuse me with facts!".
Cheers :)
Brcha
--
Filip Brcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWWeb: http://purl.org/NET/brcha/home/
Ja
wn to existing
> child processes.
Of course. It doesn't make sense to change the envvars in the runtime. It
probably could be done, but all the programs that use envvars would have to
implement some sort of signal-handler that would update internal envvars and
process them to see if they are
directories and they use
their specific kernel patch to hide /bin, /etc, /sbin, ... So the user of
GoboLinux sees only /Progams but in fact, the system does see symbolic links
(or something, I read their desctiption a long time ago) in /etc, /bin, ...
--
Filip Brcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ymbolic link to / if such
> support is needed.
Yes, of course. I just meant to say that those programs (scripts) shouldn't
necessarily be considered broken... even if they truly are.
--
Filip Brcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWWeb: http://purl.org/NET/brcha/home/
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTEC
believe that the support for them should be
provided. You can always put in some README file a note that it is not a good
idea to rely on hard coded locations, but...
--
Filip Brcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWWeb: http://purl.org/NET/brcha/home/
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTE
