Hi,
> Time to nag you again:)
I can stand that. :)
> I assume you are a GNU fan
I am a GNU maintainer. Not that this would involve much of
a carreer or promotion, but nevertheless i maintain GNU xorriso.
> How much effort is needed, do you think, to get CD/DVD/RW/RW
> capabilities for GNU/Hu
w000t!! Finally, nice job folks!!
(Sorry to have disappeared again... :-()
Barry
On 11/27/2012 9:54 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> At last that work is out!
>
> I've pushed the patchqueue from Richard to upstreams, built test debian
> packages on
>
> deb http://people.debian.org/~s
Hello,
At last that work is out!
I've pushed the patchqueue from Richard to upstreams, built test debian
packages on
deb http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/hurd-i386/tmp ./
I hope to have not forgotten anything for the dependencies: the new hurd
depends on the new libc0.3, and breaks the old
Hi Thomas,
Time to nag you again:) I assume you are a GNU fan (as I am). How much
effort is needed, do you think, to get CD/DVD/RW/RW capabilities for
GNU/Hurd. Maybe I can try to help you, but my knowledge is still very
limited, but improving.
Thanks!
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 12:12 +0200, Thomas
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 04:03:04PM +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> The public Hurd box darnassus.sceen.net suffered a problem (due to human
> error when updating kernel/libc/hurd servers), which caused a fatal
> corruption of the root file system. The machine needs to be completely
> reinstalled, and
> Thomas Schwinge writes:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:36:24 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
[…]
>> Here, a diff line could've been saved by adding an opening { to the
>> if above. (IOW, no need to drop the C grouping construct from
>> here.)
> Generally you're right with your suggestions (
Hi Ivan!
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:36:24 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> > Thomas Schwinge writes:
>
> […]
>
> > Does anyone spot any problems, or does this need more testing, or is
> > it OK to commit right away?
>
> I see none (but then, I'm not really a Mach or ATA expert),
> a
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:36:24PM +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> > Thomas Schwinge writes:
>
> […]
>
> > Does anyone spot any problems, or does this need more testing, or is
> > it OK to commit right away?
>
> I see none (but then, I'm not really a Mach or ATA expert),
> apart
> Thomas Schwinge writes:
[…]
> Does anyone spot any problems, or does this need more testing, or is
> it OK to commit right away?
I see none (but then, I'm not really a Mach or ATA expert),
apart from a few style and formatting issues.
[…]
> +if (id->cyls == 16383
Hi!
GNU Mach mis-detected a 64 GB LBA-capable IDE disk drive. As elaborated
in the patch: »The ATA spec tells large drives to return C/H/S =
16383/16/63 independent of their size. Some drives can be jumpered to
use 15 heads instead of 16.« My hd2 claimed 15 heads even without any
(visible) jump
10 matches
Mail list logo