Hello,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:55:37PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> It was agreed that unionmount should forward some of the RPCs invoked
> on its control port to the mountee. Most (if not all) of such RPCs
> are the fsys_* ones. I've made up a list of RPCs which should be
> proxied in my op
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 05:23:34PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 12:17:49AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > + /* The update thread will start the mountee when unionfs will be
> > + ready for servicing RPCs (will have completed the
> > + initiali
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:25:26AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 03:59:25PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/mount.h b/mount.h
> [...]
> > +#ifndef INCLUDED_UNIONMOUNT_H
>
> You forgot to rename the guard macro when renaming the file...
Yea
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:20:35AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:53:50PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > ulfs_check is used to update the list of ports to the underlying
> > filesystems maintained by unionfs, while node_init_root is used to
> > store a (
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:27:32PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 04:05:52PM +, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
>
> > firmlink opens its target file with any client specified open flags,
> > except O_CREAT. This makes it is possible for a client to read or
> > writ
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:17:23AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > > > + /*Opens the port on which to set the new translator */
> > > > + error_t
> > > > +open_port
> > > > +(int flags, mach_port_t * underlying,
> > > > + mach_msg_type_name_t * underlying_type, task_t t
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 12:17:49AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> + /* The update thread will start the mountee when unionfs will be
> + ready for servicing RPCs (will have completed the
> + initialization). */
> + root_update_schedule ();
> +
Hm... That still won't allow passing b
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:53:50PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 07:07:59AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:25:10PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > + ulfs_check ();
> > > + node_init_root (netfs_root_node);
> >
> > Why is this
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:01:39PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> Da Zheng, le Mon 06 Jul 2009 14:23:20 +0800, a écrit :
>>> GNU Savannah bug #25054 -- Kernel panic with eth-multiplexer,
>>> reported by antrik, isn't a bug in gnumach. It was caused by a bug
>>> in eth-mult
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 07:10:15PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> We should not update news items that have already been published (that
> is, on gnu.org; no problem for the bddebian machine), as the system
> will always also update the RSS feeds, etc., causing the old news item
> to reappea
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 04:02:01PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> + /* A path equal to "\0" will mean that the current ULFS entry is the
> + mountee port. */
> + ulfs_register ("", 0, 0);
You fixed the parameter, but you forgot to fix the comment...
-antrik-
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:21:09PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>> Well, AIUI, there are only two ways how a receive right could be used:
>> either mach_port_insert_right() (or mach_port_extract_right()) is
>> invoked, in which case we can look at the parameters, so
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 08:31:09AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:00:52PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 11:05:50PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > +After commit e227045b06d62ee7d2fbab9d5ade9030ff43170b, Git's
> > > commit m
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 02:26:10PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Since you think it's not proper to wrap the first thread at the place
> where trace exec_startup_get_info() is called, I now wrap the first
> thread of a task when the first RPC request comes.
Actual
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 03:59:25PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> diff --git a/mount.h b/mount.h
[...]
> +#ifndef INCLUDED_UNIONMOUNT_H
You forgot to rename the guard macro when renaming the file...
-antrik-
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 07:10:48PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 08:07:01PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > > + /*This is actually the end of initialization, so if something
> > > + goes bad here we are rightful to die. And, of course,
> > > + unionmount
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 04:05:52PM +, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> firmlink opens its target file with any client specified open flags,
> except O_CREAT. This makes it is possible for a client to read or
> write to the target of a firmlink using the firmlink's authority
> (io_restrict_au
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:33:17PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> The paper "An I/O System for Mach 3.0" gives very short description of
> the user-level device management: Devices can be managed from
> user-level by vectoring all device interrupts out to an application's
> thread. The kernel maps
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 04:20:59PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2009 10:27:58 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> Do you mean Berkeley Packet Filter with BPF?
Yes.
> > I made some progress with my KGI port -- I can now run GGI demo
> > programs on top of KGI/Hur
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 05:02:45PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. Juli 2009 15:01:39 schrieb Da Zheng:
> > What should the kernel do if it is out of resources?
>
> I'd say it should kill the offending process.
>
> Or if info about the offender isn't available, just kil
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 07:17:33PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 06:52:37AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > This surely needs some special handling in netfs_append_args() as
> > well?...
>
> Yes, it does, of course. I didn't implement it right here becaus
>From 77a5938d2daf940779dabaf50700d6b0e9ff927b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sergiu Ivanov
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:01:20 +
Subject: [PATCH] Orphan the mountee.
* mount.c (start_mountee): Don't attach the mountee to the proxy
node.
---
Another correction: the previous patch orphaned the mou
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 03:41:51PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 09:50:12PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:55:37PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > > * fsys_
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 09:56:33AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:18:58AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > For the sake of pushing the horizon of my knowledge, I'd like to ask
> > one more question: is nfs a kind of an interface to nfsd, the latter
> > being respo
Hello!
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:18:58AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> For the sake of pushing the horizon of my knowledge, I'd like to ask
> one more question: is nfs a kind of an interface to nfsd, the latter
> being responsible for actually fetching the remote filesystems,
> maintaining caches
25 matches
Mail list logo
