Hi, On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 08:31:09AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:00:52PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 11:05:50PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > +After commit e227045b06d62ee7d2fbab9d5ade9030ff43170b, Git's > > > commit messages +are valid. > > > > Is it really *after*, or starting with?... > > > > A less ambiguous wording would be preferable :-) > > Yes, I'm myself not entirely happy with the wording. > > e227 is the last CVS commit. So indeed *after* that one the pure Git > ones begin. (Obviously we can't know the SHA1 of the commit > to-be-created, so we can't use that one as ``starting with''.) Or is > there some flaw in my logic? No, the logic is fine. It's just that everyone reading it will probably have the same doubts... Perhaps it helps to be more verbose? "commit e227045 is the last commit imported from CVS. All commits created after that have correct information." -antrik-
