At Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:50:58 +0100,
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > Rationale: split as far as it's still making sense. There is no
> > > reason to have an interger hashing library, a pthread
> > > implementation, an ext2 file system interpreter, libc amendments,
> > > Hurd interfaces
Thomas Schwinge, le Sun 11 Jan 2009 12:41:45 +0100, a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:43:17PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Oops, as I don't really care whether CVS/svn/git/whatever is used, I
> > overlooked this thread
>
> That's why I addressed this email directly to you. Perhaps you c
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:05:52PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Olaf said some of the things I was thinking.
When replying there, I hope to have addressed your concerns as well.
> In short, I think this plan is too clever by half.
Thanks ;-). Indeed I spent some time on this issue, be
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:38:20AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 12:05:07AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Only convert GNU Mach's gnumach-1-branch, GNU MIG's HEAD, GNU Hurd's
> > HEAD.
> >
> > With the exception of the GNU Mach Xen branch and the H
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 05:25:55PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Jim Meyering has done the cvs->git work for various things on sourceware.
> (As I recommended for Hurd some months ago, this can be done in a
> noncommittal way before switching from cvs for commits to existing
> branches.)
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:43:17PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Oops, as I don't really care whether CVS/svn/git/whatever is used, I
> overlooked this thread
That's why I addressed this email directly to you. Perhaps you can get
such mails appear with a higher score in your mailer than
