Thomas Schwinge, le Sun 11 Jan 2009 12:41:45 +0100, a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:43:17PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Oops, as I don't really care whether CVS/svn/git/whatever is used, I > > overlooked this thread > > That's why I addressed this email directly to you. Perhaps you can get > such mails appear with a higher score in your mailer than the list mails > do? (That's at least what I am doing: directly-addressed mails go into > the INBOX and list mails are sorted into separate folders.)
Just the same for me. > | For the GNU Mach Xen branch, I'd like Samuel to tell when that one is > | ready for being merged into the main GNU Mach 1 branch and then I > | intend to do that merge as one big aggregated ``blob'' (i.e., without > | preserving the individual development, testing, debugging, > | etc. commits. > > Do you think it is worthwhile to preserve your individual commits? I think it's not. > > Somebody in the Xen > > community made a patch to automatically provide several modules to Xen > > domUs (as grub does), but I'm still waiting for him to submit it. > > How difficult (if at all possible) do you think it would be to use pyGrub > and thus configure the Hurd system's booting procedure directly from > within the domU's partition? PyGRUB doesn't overcome the domU module passing limitation, PV-GRUB which I developped at XenSource doesn't either. The problem really lies at the domU module passing interface. And then yes, PyGRUB or PV-GRUB would work. Samuel
